On Wednesday 26 September 2007 4:40 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> > How about I take a different approach here, and ask...
> >
> > What would be the recommended way to minimize the number of automated
> > CPANPLUS test failures, knowing that I -have- to have Apache::Test
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> Anyway, should the DSLIP stuff be added to the META-spec? (I see that
> some stuff, like the S and L parts, are already covered by META.yml. Is
> the rest worth adding, or is it time to forget about it?)
Something like the DSLIP in purpose, but not exactly DSLIP. That
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 7:08 pm, David Golden wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I'd like, though, is to at least stem/slow the number of CPAN
> > testers failures or at least get them turned into something more like "no
> > idea; build environment not
On 9/27/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok... THATS a useful answer. :)
>
> So... if I set up my Makefile.PL to check for the presence of any modules that
> I require for configuration (e.g. "Apache::Test") and then simply "exit
> 0" -before- the Makefile is written, it'll abort t
On Thursday 27 September 2007 12:28 pm, David Golden wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok... THATS a useful answer. :)
> >
> > So... if I set up my Makefile.PL to check for the presence of any modules
> > that I require for configuration (e.g. "Apache::Test") and
# from Graham TerMarsch
# on Thursday 27 September 2007 12:38:
>> There's a new META.yml field under development called
>> "configure_requires" to account for that case. The latest CPAN.pm
>> supports it. Again, I don't know about CPANPLUS.
>
>Cool. For my own edification, how does CPAN behave
On 9/27/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can actually verify that CPANPLUS doesn't send automated "failure" reports
> when no Makefile is generated; I tested that locally myself this morning
> after reading your previous message.
That's good news.
> That's what I'm finding too;
On Thursday 27 September 2007 12:57 pm, David Golden wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cool. For my own edification, how does CPAN behave when it encounters a
> > missing "configure_requires"? Does it simply install the dependency and
> > then continue, or does
# from David Golden
# on Thursday 27 September 2007 12:57:
>> Although CPAN doesn't support this in a release yet, knowing that
>> doing "exit 0" will at least help keep CPANPLUS from filing false
>> failures is a step in the right direction. :)
>
>Absolutely. Now we need to publicize it. I'll go
On Thursday 27 September 2007 2:02 pm, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from David Golden
> # on Thursday 27 September 2007 12:57:
> >> Although CPAN doesn't support this in a release yet, knowing that
> >> doing "exit 0" will at least help keep CPANPLUS from filing false
> >> failures is a step in the righ
10 matches
Mail list logo
