On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:35:52 +0100, Michael G Schwern
wrote:
As a result of the discussions, I'm now reconsidering using Mouse in TB2.
Good!
This is a critical violation of encapsulation.
Yes.
Plus, what would happen if at some point Mouse wanted to
use TB2 for its test suite?
--
Cosi
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:21:13PM -0600, brian d foy wrote:
> In article <20111205154758.gh17...@bytemark.barnyard.co.uk>, David
> Cantrell wrote:
> > There's at least one other significant difference: CPAN has an
> > up-to-date index. BackPAN doesn't.
> Well, CPAN's index is also BackPAN's inde
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:32 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:21:13PM -0600, brian d foy wrote:
>> In article <20111205154758.gh17...@bytemark.barnyard.co.uk>, David
>> Cantrell wrote:
>> > There's at least one other significant difference: CPAN has an
>> > up-to-date index.
On 2011.12.6 1:23 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> Plus, what would happen if at some point Mouse wanted to
> use TB2 for its test suite?
You might have missed that part of the conversation. TB2 would not depend on
Mouse, it has its own embedded copy. It would work fine.
--
"Clutter and overload
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:50:16 +0100, Michael G Schwern
wrote:
On 2011.12.6 1:23 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
Plus, what would happen if at some point Mouse wanted to
use TB2 for its test suite?
You might have missed that part of the conversation. TB2 would not
depend on
Mouse, it has its
On 2011.12.6 10:56 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> I wasn't referring to a dependency problem,
> but to the actual code being the same on the
> thing-that-tests and thing-that-is-being-tested.
It would be a problem if they were the same code, but they're not because
TB2::Mouse is a copy of an earlie
On Dec 5, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Leon Timmermans wrote:
>> So, uhh... I'm going to go do a bad thing.
>
> What would be the repercussions of putting this in the fridge a little
> longer (I know, it's been in there for far too long already) and
> porting it to the upcoming mop?
*How* much longer? Does
On Dec 5, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Leon Timmermans wrote:
>> *How* much longer? Does the upcoming MOP include syntax (class, method, role
>> keywords) and stuff like roles? Will one be able to drop Mouse in favor of
>> it?
>
> I just asked doy. It will support all of that, but not on older
> versions
