che::TestRunPerl->generate_script();
};
my $mm = $@ ? \&WriteMakefile : \&ModPerl::MM::WriteMakefile;
$mm->(
...
'PREREQ_PM' => {
'Apache::Test' => 1.12,
'mod_perl2' => 2.0,
...
},
);
--
Graham TerMarsch
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 2:36 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> > So... to accommodate those who didn't have Module::Build installed, I set
> > up a basic Makefile.PL, following the general guidelines from
> > Apache::Test. Unfortunately, mo
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 3:41 pm, David Golden wrote:
> I don't think Module::Build can be a build_requires. I think it has to
> be a configure_requires. (Not that support is widespread yet.)
>
> On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Graha
nvironment not suitable for this module".
Its all perception... right now I've got people asking me how I can claim that
the module works when all they're seeing is CPAN Tester failures. They're
not going to go to the trouble of actually reading the failures to find out
why they failed, they're just seeing high failure rates and asking questions.
--
Graham TerMarsch
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 4:40 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> > How about I take a different approach here, and ask...
> >
> > What would be the recommended way to minimize the number of automated
> > CPANPLUS test failures, knowing that I
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 7:08 pm, David Golden wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I'd like, though, is to at least stem/slow the number of CPAN
> > testers failures or at least get them turned into something more like "no
On Thursday 27 September 2007 12:28 pm, David Golden wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok... THATS a useful answer. :)
> >
> > So... if I set up my Makefile.PL to check for the presence of any modules
> > that I require for config
On Thursday 27 September 2007 12:57 pm, David Golden wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cool. For my own edification, how does CPAN behave when it encounters a
> > missing "configure_requires"? Does it simply install the dependency
ut they also show that they've got
Module::Build involved. Being that the report includes "./Build test" in it
instead of "make test", I'm presuming that it means that they've actually got
M::B running.
Is true, though, that the vast majority of CPAN tester reports don't have M::B
installed.
--
Graham TerMarsch
Howling Frog Internet Development, Inc.
On Sunday 30 September 2007 7:55 am, Jos I. Boumans wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2007, at 2:15 AM, Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 September 2007 4:40 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > > Write a Build.PL with a compatibility Makefile.PL and make sure that
> > > Apach
ck and try it out).
Although setting it to "ext=s@" lets you hand in multiple extensions on the
cmd line, they're not used properly when it gets handed down the line to
App::Prove::State.
That said, though, it doesn't look _that_ hard to make this work, just not
quite as simple as above.
--
Graham TerMarsch
Howling Frog Internet Development, Inc.
eaned from your hacking that could improve that, I'd love to get it in
there.
--
Graham TerMarsch
ns" Continuous Integration instance.
Khai, if you specifically need results _without_ that element, could you not
post-process the output to remove it? Further, what are you trying to feed
the JUnit results into?
--
Graham TerMarsch
ompatibility. In all honesty, you're the first person I've heard from who
has tried using the module to integrate TAP output via an Ant junitreport
task; everyone else I'm heard from or have worked with has specifically been
using Hudson/Jenkins as the reporter.
--
Graham TerMarsch
eate individual JUnit XML
files, you'll get one test suite per file. If you're capturing the full
output from TAP::Formatter::JUnit, however, you'll get multiple suites in the
resulting JUnit XML stream.
--
Graham TerMarsch
: I'm the author of TAP::Formatter::JUnit)
--
Graham TerMarsch
16 matches
Mail list logo
