Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > You capture the output of 'make test' and manipuate that line > directly?? Eek! No, I add extra Perl code to that line to set environment variables and such. Maybe there's another way to do it but its not exactly like these things are well documen

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Ken Williams
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> >> > Any particularly good reason we're showing all that "PERL_DL_NONLAZY" >> > noise as part of "make test"? What about just: >> >> I d

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 02-Oct-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Tels wrote: >> Me. It doesn't hurt, > Well, it does. It's more junk that obscures the true purpose, which How actually? For humans? Or for machines, whi

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > > Any particularly good reason we're showing all that "PERL_DL_NONLAZY" > > noise as part of "make test"? What about just: > > I do some weird stuff with that piece to pass data aroun

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Tels wrote: > On 02-Oct-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >> Running tests for ExtUtils::MakeMaker > >> t/ExtUtilsok

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Ken Williams
Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >> Any particularly good reason we're showing all that "PERL_DL_NONLAZY" >> noise as part of "make test"? What about just: > > I do some weird stuff with that piece to pass data around to my tests. > Sometim

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Any particularly good reason we're showing all that "PERL_DL_NONLAZY" > noise as part of "make test"? What about just: I do some weird stuff with that piece to pass data around to my tests. Sometimes its useful to see it. How about only showing it

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 02-Oct-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> Running tests for ExtUtils::MakeMaker >> t/ExtUtilsok >> Al

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Running tests for ExtUtils::MakeMaker > t/ExtUtilsok > All tests successful. > Files=1, Tests=27, 7 wallclock secs ( 5.93 cusr + 1.15 csys = 7.08 CPU)

Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Michael G Schwern
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -e 'use Test::Harness qw(&runtests $verbose); $verbose=0; runtests @ARGV;' t/*.t t/ExtUtilsok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=27, 8 wallclock secs ( 6.20 cu