MakeMaker vs File::Spec (was Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0)

2001-11-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:36:45PM +0100, Tels wrote: > > sub canonpath { > > return File::Spec->canonpath($_[1]); > > } > > I'd written return File::Spec->canonpath(@_); just in case ;) The first argument has to be ignored (it's the MakeMaker object) and canonpath() takes just o

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Michael G Schwern [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>It's almost like that game show, "Win Lincoln Stein's Money" I think it's...Ben Stein's Money. This is a clear sign you need to get out more often. :) *>Remember, the sooner I have to cough up the money, the sooner I'll *>have to get a job. And

RE: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Tels wrote: > * There are a couple of functions I have tests for, BUT: > > =item canonpath > > No physical check on the filesystem, but a logical cleanup of a > path. On UNIX eliminated successive slashes and successive "/.". > > =cut > > [snip

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread David M. Lloyd
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Tels wrote: > > sub canonpath { > > return File::Spec->canonpath($_[1]); > > } > > I'd written return File::Spec->canonpath(@_); just in case ;) That won't work quite right, you'd either need to do: return File::Spec->canonpath(@_[1..$#_]); or maybe: s

QA Wiki Working again [was Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0]

2001-11-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:09:23PM +0100, Tels wrote: > But Wiki is not pleased: > > Software error: > > Could not get editing lock at perl-qa-wiki.cgi line 3224. The permissions on the Wiki are borked. Fixed it with a little trickery, it should work now. Haven't bribed my sysadmin lately, I

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 19-Nov-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:11:51PM +0100, Tels wrote: >> oh, related to: >> >> http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2001-11/msg01172.h >> tml >> >> ? > > Yes. You can pretty m

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:11:51PM +0100, Tels wrote: > oh, related to: > > http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2001-11/msg01172.html > > ? Yes. You can pretty much just make them thin wrappers around the appropriate File::Spec method to preserve the MM interface and mention

RE: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, oh, related to: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2001-11/msg01172.html ? On 19-Nov-01 Tels tried to scribble about: [snip] > * There are a couple of functions I have tests for, BUT: > > =item canonpath > > No phy

RE: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 19-Nov-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > Here's something that would be nice to get done, finish off testing > last three dozen modules and let YAS have $500 of my money. > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedMo

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:05:35AM -0500, Ryan King wrote: > On 2001.11.19, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:22:09AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedModules > > Since there is a huge, prac

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Ryan King
On 2001.11.19, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:22:09AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedModules Since there is a huge, practical, difference between "Having stuff in t/*" and "Tested well enou

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread lenzo
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 07:15:02PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Here's something that would be nice to get done, finish off testing > last three dozen modules and let YAS have $500 of my money. > > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedModules Michael, Thanks :) W

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:22:09AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedModules > > It looks like Pod::Find and Pod::Checker have tests already in the current > tree in t/pod. Ok, scrub them off the list. > Pod::InputObjects is used by

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Tim Jenness
I'm intending to add a real test to Pod::LaTeX in the next couple of days when I release V0.54. On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Here's something that would be nice to get done, finish off testing > last three dozen modules and let YAS have $500 of my money. > > http://www.pobo

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's something that would be nice to get done, finish off testing > last three dozen modules and let YAS have $500 of my money. > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedModules > It's almost like that game show, "Win Linc