On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 10:05 AM, Tony Bowden wrote:
>> Makes it simpler for people who prefer the 'no_plan' style of
>> testing
>
> Maybe this is what I just don't get. I'm not one of those people, so I
> don't really understand why people might prefer it. Especially here
>
Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> There's been a new version of Test::Class coming 'real soon' for a few
> months now :-)
[...]
> I'm considering two changes.
> a) Test methods default to an arbitrary number of tests.
> b) Use undef rather than 'no_pl
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 01:40:39AM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> - In hindsight, having a 1 test default was probably a hangover from
> JUnit thinking... I never really considered any alternatives.
I have to say I like the way this currently is... most of my test
methods only have one test .
Hi all,
There's been a new version of Test::Class coming 'real soon' for a few
months now :-)
Amongst the bug fixes and extensions I've been considering a couple of
changes that I'm not 100% on and would appreciate any comments /
feedback / abuse on offer... it's late so apologies if this makes
