Re: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-05 Thread Robert Spier
> There really aren't many tests that are meaningful without that access. > 00.load.t, 99.pod and add_header.t are all that seem to be valid > without it. You could allow the user to choose between internal and external tests, where the internal tests are much simpler, maybe including a trivi

Re: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-05 Thread Andy Lester
I installed it on a machine at work, and a large number of tests failed because the machine has no access to the outside world. Fixing that is probably more effort than it is worth, but you might want to keep it in mind for the next major rewrite. There really aren't many tests that are meaningful

Re: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-05 Thread Paul Johnson
Andy Lester said: > There's a new version of WWW::Mechanize for you people who do automated > testing with it. It adds a title() and is_html() method, and removes > the dependency on Clone, which I hope will fix stability issues on > Windows. Nice, thanks. I installed it on a machine at work,

Re: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-05 Thread Andy Lester
Damn. I still forgot to check out this incredible cool sounding module, I have some HTML-output testing in a testsuite and it is very whacky and uncomplete... I'd be glad to look at it, and see what kinds of things Mechanize can do. xoa -- Andy Lester, lead singer & driver of the Winnebago [EMA

RE: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-05 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 04-Mar-03 Andy Lester carved into stone: > There's a new version of WWW::Mechanize for you people who do automated > testing with it. It adds a title() and is_html() method, and removes > the dependency on Clone, which I hope will fix stability issue