At 7:39 PM -1000 11/7/01, Tim Jenness wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote:
I think it's supposed to verify that dynaloading has
not set errno, but for us it does:
Are you sure it's not meant to be testing that POSIX::errno equals the
numeric value of $! ? Or is there another
At 11:56 AM 11/7/2001 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
not ok 28 # POSIX::errno(): 20, $!: 0
which I think means autoloading sets errno but isn't supposed to. I suspect
it's doing a -d somewhere and leaving an errno of ENOTDIR laying about. Hmm.
Well, $! is meant to be exactly errno so it
I've made some progress getting this test to run (see working patch below)
but I still get one failure:
not ok 28 # POSIX::errno(): 20, $!: not a directory
20 is the correct value for ENOTDIR, but how can POSIX::errno() and $! be
expected to be numerically equal when $! returns a string? Or
set up should take care of it.
--
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Literary critics usually know what they're
talking about. Even if they're wrong.
-- Perl creator Larry Wall
At 11:59 AM 9/24/2001 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:23 PM 9/23/2001 -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote:
Basically we're pre-loading a hash when you use keys or values on
%ENV, and if I understand this right, hash elements are not
full-blown scalars and thus do not have tainting bits. Getting
it.
--
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... getting out of a sonnet is much more
difficult than getting in.
Brad Leithauser
#13 is a known bug in the vmsish
'hushed' pragma. I haven't gotten too far with the others but
can try to post detailed results if anyone is interested.
--
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Literary critics usually know what
