Re: Devel::Tinderclient 0.01, please test

2001-10-01 Thread Zach Lipton
s to setup special daemon accounts, cronjobs etc... Zach On 10/1/01 8:03 PM, "Michael G Schwern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:16:01PM -0700, Zach Lipton wrote: >> I just pushed the first version of the perl tinderbox client (1.0p1) to CPAN > >

Devel::Tinderclient 0.02, here we go again!

2001-10-01 Thread Zach Lipton
It was somewhat dumb of me not to do enough manual testing on this (this is why I have to get some automated tests up), but I fixed all the errors and things should be good to go. I also fixed an issue on the server side where the logs weren't being displayed. That should be fixed now. I am curre

Devel::Tinderclient 0.01, please test

2001-10-01 Thread Zach Lipton
I just pushed the first version of the perl tinderbox client (1.0p1) to CPAN and could use some help testing. This may barf in your face, but I would rather know that now rather than after I make a big announcement about it and find it doesn't work. I currently have two configs, one for parrot (by

Re: Compaq Testdrive

2001-09-23 Thread Zach Lipton
On 9/23/01 2:03 AM, "Simon Cozens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 07:38:22PM -0700, Zach Lipton wrote: >> Actually, once the tinderbox server is set-up (still not sure how this is >> coming) why not turn this into tinderbox clients? > &

Re: Compaq Testdrive

2001-09-22 Thread Zach Lipton
Actually, once the tinderbox server is set-up (still not sure how this is coming) why not turn this into tinderbox clients? That would really make testing a dream. Zach On 9/22/01 4:12 PM, "Michael G Schwern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I completely forgot I had this. > > Compaq has a progra

Re: Untested libraries update

2001-09-20 Thread Zach Lipton
I don't know why this didn't occur to me before, but why not put this in a Wiki? It seems to be a _huge_ pain to mail this list out every few weeks whenever something changes, why not post it up and allow people to mark it up a little: say that they are working on a test so the effort isn't duplic

Re: Update on untested modules

2001-09-02 Thread Zach Lipton
I'll see what I can do with Net::Ping. I don't really know what CPAN::Nox does, but I'll take a look at that as well. At the very least, I'll do a compile test for it and have a framework for more tests. Zach On 9/2/01 9:29 PM, "Michael G Schwern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok-doke. Nibbling

Tinderbox for testing

2001-07-30 Thread Zach Lipton
All-- I am still fumbling with the test scripts to get them working without an NFS env, but I also realized that the tinderbox package from mozilla.org might be useful for perl. Tinderbox has two parts: client and server. The client pulls source code from the repository, compiles, and tests it.

Re: Perl testing

2001-07-11 Thread Zach Lipton
I would also be willing to help. I can test on mac os x and (soon), linuxppc. Assuming that no-one is doing these configs, please let me know. Thanks Zach On 7/11/01 1:26 AM, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed 11 Jul 2001 00:58, "Justin Jeffs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Pe

Docs on testing?

2001-06-20 Thread Zach Lipton
I am not a newcomer to this list, just a squatter and I have been programming Perl for about a year now (and lovin' every minute of it). After reading all the postings on this list about Test::Simple, etc... I was wondering, are there any (or plans to create any) docs that explain how to write tes