On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:03:46PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
The name of the function and order of arguments are all up for
discussion.
Thanks, applied.
About the name: I think it's an awful name... doesn't tell me at least
at all what it's for (except maybe for doubling as
As long ago promised, here's a patch to pull the logic out of
t/run/kill_perl.t and make it into a t/test.pl function.
This means its no longer necessary to pile segfault checks into
t/run/kill_perl.t. They can be placed in the appropriate test file
like so:
kill_perl(PROG, EXPECT, {},
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:26:27AM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
As long ago promised, here's a patch to pull the logic out of
t/run/kill_perl.t and make it into a t/test.pl function.
This means its no longer necessary to pile segfault checks into
t/run/kill_perl.t. They can be placed in
PS There was also a bug in runperl(). All switches were being lost.
Well, this change made several tests (like run/switches) to barf.
So I backed out that hunk.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. --
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
PS There was also a bug in runperl(). All switches were being lost.
Well, this change made several tests (like run/switches) to barf.
So I backed out that hunk.
Urk, so now three of kill_perl tests tests are failing...
