[Quoting Kirrily Robert, on October 9 2001, 23:56, in "Re: Test::Harness in"]
> I think he's trying to say that Perl (i.e. the "Perl community") should
> define these things so that different packagers (Debian, Red Hat,
> whoever) can have somewhat-consistent packages.
Exactly. Sorry for my uncle
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
>> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
>> > to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
>> > handful
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
> > to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
> > handful of critical modules ...
>
>
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
> to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
> handful of critical modules ...
Wouldn't it be a good idea to try to define packages like these, so
that
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:59:48AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > Debian. ;)
>
> Actually, I was more thinking in terms of delivering perl not in one
> single rpm, but to have one rpm for barebones perl, and rpms for each
> of the individual core modules (or logical sets of core modules).
Debia
[Quoting Michael G Schwern, on October 8 2001, 14:46, in "Re: Test::Harness in"]
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:20:20AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > But I agree with everyone who says there should be a better, more
> > generic solution.
>
> Debian. ;)
Actually, I was more thinking in terms of d
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:20:20AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> But I agree with everyone who says there should be a better, more
> generic solution.
Debian. ;)
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It means both packages lay claim to /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Test/Harness.pm and
> /usr/share/man/man3/Test::Harness.3pm.gz. Can't happen
Oh yes, it does. Frequently.
I ran into the same problem when I tried to make installable packages
for Getopt::Lo
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 05:09:29PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote:
> I've built an RPM of Test-SDK using cpan2rpm, and when I try to install
> it on a Red Hat system it says:
>
> [root@e-smith skud]# rpm -Uvh perl-Test-SDK-0.04-1.i386.rpm
> Preparing...###
