On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Zach Lipton wrote:
> I'll see what I can do with Net::Ping. I don't really know what CPAN::Nox
> does, but I'll take a look at that as well.
It loads the CPAN module configured not to use MD5, LWP and
Compress::Zlib.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:39:26PM -0700, Zach Lipton wrote:
> I'll see what I can do with Net::Ping. I don't really know what CPAN::Nox
> does, but I'll take a look at that as well. At the very least, I'll do a
> compile test for it and have a framework for more tests.
CPAN::Nox is just CPAN wit
I'll see what I can do with Net::Ping. I don't really know what CPAN::Nox
does, but I'll take a look at that as well. At the very least, I'll do a
compile test for it and have a framework for more tests.
Zach
On 9/2/01 9:29 PM, "Michael G Schwern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok-doke. Nibbling
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ones that bother me are the Pod::* tests. I know Pod::Parser's CPAN
> version has tests. Pod::Text & Pod::Man (the podulators),
> unfortunately, do not. Pod::LaTeX only has a compile test.
I'd love it if someone would generalize the Pod::Par
Ok-doke. Nibbling away. Andrew Wilson is plowing through CGI::*.
He's got a CGI::Carp test in the works. Alexander Gough did
File::Compare a few months ago. Gelly got Shell.
The ones that bother me are the Pod::* tests. I know Pod::Parser's
CPAN version has tests. Pod::Text & Pod::Man (the
