On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:59:48AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > Debian. ;)
>
> Actually, I was more thinking in terms of delivering perl not in one
> single rpm, but to have one rpm for barebones perl, and rpms for each
> of the individual core modules (or logical sets of core modules).
Debia
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:30:58PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> OK, I've been putting off figuring this out for ages, but here it is:
Another way to accomplish the same thing, that I hacked up to
test an internal password-protected web gadget:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:17:06AM -0400, Shane Landrum wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:30:58PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
|wrote:
| > OK, I've been putting off figuring this out for ages, but here it is:
|
|
|
| Another way to accomplish the same thing, that I hacked
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
> to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
> handful of critical modules ...
Wouldn't it be a good idea to try to define packages like these, so
that
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
> > to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
> > handful of critical modules ...
>
>
Straight from the pumking's mouth:
- Forwarded message from Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 5.8.0 to-do list
The bad news is that it seems that the things on what I consider to
be a todo list are relativ
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.31.tar.gz
Three major new things in this version. I think this should make
everyone happy.
* Test::More::is_deeply()
A deep comparison version of is() with sensible
diagnostics:
use Test::More tests => 1;
$foo = { foo => [1..9] }; $ba
Our fearless pumpking recently weighed in on test names that assume success.
What he said made a lot of sense. If a test fails, the message looks all
wrong.
That may compel some people to fix the tests or the modules, but it may confuse
more people.
Here's a patch to Test::Tutorial that improve
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:25:08PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> Here's a patch to Test::Tutorial that improves the test names along those
> criteria. It may be worth adding a few lines on good test names.
>
> Maybe it's worth discussing good testing style, too.
Maybe it's worth editing on the Wiki
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
>> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
>> > to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
>> > handful
10 matches
Mail list logo
