When they work, you can CC special addresses in a reply, and things
happen.
For example, if you cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] the ticket will be closed.
I don't remember the exact syntax, but I think
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will close it as notabug.
Other keywords include 'patch' 'note', etc.
Join them with
g
"Strings aren't blank").
I thought those strings were meant to output during the testing, to show
you what it's testing for. Am I confused?
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
Real programmers don't bring brown-bag lunches. If the vending machine
doesn't sell it, they don't eat it. Vending machines don't sell quiche.
ings were meant to output during the testing, to show
you what it's testing for. Am I confused?
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"My secret weapon is PMS." -- Buffy the Vampire Slayer
ere any (or plans to create any) docs that explain how to
>write tests?
I believe I volunteered to do that the other day. More fool me :)
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
There's nothing wrong with me; therefore, there must be something wrong
with the universe.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:42:29PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
|
| I assume you're talking about "make test"? Test::Harness in
| non-verbose mode (ie. "make test") won't display any of that info. If
| you set $verbose = 1 you'll see all the test output. For failed tests
| it will just repo
common/popular documentation markup language. This means that you don't
have to know all of Docbook to write Docbook -- you can write in this
cut-down, intermediate level: DocPOD
5. There are some modules for doing the translation etc, see DocPod::*,
presumably on CPAN.
HTH,
K.
--
Kirrily
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:56:30PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote:
>> This script...
>
>Nifty, mind if I assimilate it as an example script?
Not at all. Credit as Kirrily "Skud" Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> please.
K.
--
Now winging its way towards CPAN mirrors worldwide.
I've implemented it pretty much as described the other day.
Comments etc welcome.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"Sure, only 2 percent of the Internet population uses lynx, bu
ms. I rewrote all the test analysis logic and I still afraid I
>broke something.
We're probably going to start using it for e-smith's testing foo.
I've dinked around with it briefly, enough to know that it does roughly
what I want, but I'm not on any kind of unusual platform o
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>Will do.
No! Read on! It's been done already.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
Any sufficiently fucked-up technology is indistinguishable from magic.
! It says something like:
not ok 23
# Failed test 1 (eval.t at line 69)
# got: 'blah blah blah'
# expected: ''
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"There are three degrees of being weird. There are: 1) Salvageably weird.
2) Weird. 3) Irrevocably weird." -- Carrie Fisher
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>So like I said, either tests are habitually failing on vmsperl, or
>nobody's compiled Perl on OS/390 in a long time (I wouldn't be
>surprised if that were true).
I assume you mean "MVS"?
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PRO
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>
>If someone would be so kind as to fill in TestTutorial from the latest
>version of Test::Tutorial?
Done.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"Verbogeny is one of the pleasurettes of a creatific thinkerizer."
-- Peter da Silva
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:41:39 -0400
>Kirrily 'Skud' Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Anyone know what might cause this? The same reporter also had the same
>> problem with CPAN-Test-Reporter.
>
>His Test::Harness nee
l community") should
define these things so that different packagers (Debian, Red Hat,
whoever) can have somewhat-consistent packages.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
If it's not broken, break it.
re that handles incoming email. Doesn't
implement any of its own ok()-like routines at all, just makes it easy
to use Test::More's routines on incoming email.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
Usenet: open mouth, insert foot, propagate internationally
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>I think I have a solution to the rigidity of is(). ie. something with
>the diagnostic output of is(), but the flexibility of ok().
>It all makes sense, so what I really need is a better name.
How about:
compare($foo, "<=", $bar)
K.
--
Kirrily
>> And where did the p5p FAQ get to?
>MJD said he was taking it off his website... or do you mean the serious one?
Do you mean this?
http://simon-cozens.org/writings/p5p-faq
If someone wants to become a new champion for it, we can keep it on
http://dev.perl.org/perl5. (Another way to enable th
Alain Barbet writes:
>> Have you seen http://tinderbox.perl.org ? I've personally found that
>> useful for monitoring Parrot, though it's not obvious how well it would
>> scale for large numbers of smoke-test configurations.
>
>No I didn't know this, but find some good idea in this system too.
>I
> Help me out here. I'm trying to imagine why someone would want
> WWW::Mechanize without a net connection. Or are you saying that people
> will want to use it strictly behind a restrictive firewall where
> google.com isn't accessible?
Yes.
-R
> There really aren't many tests that are meaningful without that access.
> 00.load.t, 99.pod and add_header.t are all that seem to be valid
> without it.
You could allow the user to choose between internal and external
tests, where the internal tests are much simpler, maybe including a
trivi
| > Can anyone please clarify this a bit?
|
| With respect to exercising modules, this should all work. Did the
| module pass its own tests? Actually, there's only one test at the
| moment, but it does include a module. What you did should have worked.
| You should have got a report about t/f
This script...
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Pod::Coverage;
use ExtUtils::Installed;
my $m = ExtUtils::Installed->new;
my @modules = $m->modules();
print "Checking POD coverage...\n";
my %coverage;
foreach my $mod (@modules) {
my $pc = new Pod::Coverage package => $mod;
$coverag
Anyone know what might cause this? The same reporter also had the same
problem with CPAN-Test-Reporter.
K.
This distribution has been tested as part of the cpan-testers
effort to test as many new uploads to CPAN as possible. See
http://testers.cpan.org/
Please cc any replies to [EMAIL PRO
* Sending output somewhere more useful than a logfile
* Integrating into a real "test suite" that's friendly to
Test::Harness
* Handling MIME in a suitable way
SEE ALSO
the Test::More manpage, the Mail::Header manpage, the Mail::Audit
manpage
AUTHOR
Kirrily "Skud" Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OK, I've been putting off figuring this out for ages, but here it is:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Inline 'WebChat';
use Test::More 'no_plan';
ok(google(), "Can get google");
__END__
__WebChat__
sub google {
GET http://google.
Both Test::More and WWW::Chat export a routine called fail(). This
makes it rather hard to write tests for web stuff using both these
modules.
Since WWW::Chat's fail() is only used internally, could I possibly
request that it be changed to not export, and/or rename it _fail, or
whatever. Anythi
I've built an RPM of Test-SDK using cpan2rpm, and when I try to install
it on a Red Hat system it says:
[root@e-smith skud]# rpm -Uvh perl-Test-SDK-0.04-1.i386.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Test/Harness.pm from instal
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:17:06AM -0400, Shane Landrum wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:30:58PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
|wrote:
| > OK, I've been putting off figuring this out for ages, but here it is:
|
|
|
| Another way to accomplish the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:50:12PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:52:12PM -0500, Kirrily Robert wrote:
>
> Are we doing the time warp again, or are the Huskies just tired of
> pulling the packets across the border?
>
>
> > How abou
Using Test::More, how can I intersperse stuff for user interaction? For
instance:
print "Please enter the hostname/ip for the server [localhost]: ";
my $host = ;
print "Please enter the admin password [default]: ";
my $password = ;
$agent = esmith::FormMagick::Tester->new(host => $host, password
31 matches
Mail list logo
