On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:25:33AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
> ./miniperl -w -Ilib -MExporter -e '' || gmake minitest
> ./miniperl -Ilib configpm configpm.tmp
> Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected continuation
> byte 0x54, with no preceding start byte) in printf at
> configpm line 63.
> Malforme
--- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:37:36AM -0700, rajarshi
> das wrote:
>
> > However, if I change the first instance to :
> > --- utf8.c 2004-11-17 18:22:09.0
> +0530
> > +++ utf8.c.22005-07-28 13:48:24.0
> +0530
> > @@ -363,6 +3
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:37:36AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
> However, if I change the first instance to :
> --- utf8.c 2004-11-17 18:22:09.0 +0530
> +++ utf8.c.22005-07-28 13:48:24.0 +0530
> @@ -363,6 +363,11 @@ Perl_utf8n_to_uvuni(pTHX_ U8 *s,
> STRLEN
> warnin
--- rajarshi das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:34:02AM -0700, rajarshi
> > das wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, the second call to NATIVE_TO_UTF is still
> > present
> > > in the modified code. Typically, one wouldnt
> wa
--- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:34:02AM -0700, rajarshi
> das wrote:
>
> > Yes, the second call to NATIVE_TO_UTF is still
> present
> > in the modified code. Typically, one wouldnt want
> to
> > do a NATIVE_TO_UTF(NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv)) which is
> what I
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:34:02AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
> Yes, the second call to NATIVE_TO_UTF is still present
> in the modified code. Typically, one wouldnt want to
> do a NATIVE_TO_UTF(NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv)) which is what I
> am doing due to the second call. But does that make a
> difference
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:29:43PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:22:55AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I made the following modifications to utf8.c :
> > #ifdef EBCDIC
> > uv = NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv);
> > #endif
>
> Where in utf8.c? Your description of what yo
--- Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:29:43PM +0100, Nicholas
> Clark wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:22:55AM -0700, rajarshi
> das wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I made the following modifications to utf8.c :
> > > #ifdef EBCDIC
> > > uv = NATIVE_TO_UTF(u
--- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:55:21AM -0700, rajarshi
> das wrote:
>
> > The change is in the fn Perl_utf8n_to_uvuni :
> > ---
> > .
> >
> >
> > #define UTF8_WARN_LONG 8
> > #define UTF8_WARN_
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:55:21AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
> The change is in the fn Perl_utf8n_to_uvuni :
> ---
> .
>
>
> #define UTF8_WARN_LONG 8
> #define UTF8_WARN_ 9 /*
> Also FFFE. */
>
> if (curlen ==
--- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:22:55AM -0700, rajarshi
> das wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I made the following modifications to utf8.c :
> > #ifdef EBCDIC
> > uv = NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv);
> > #endif
>
> Where in utf8.c? Your description of what you
> changed i
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:22:55AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
> Hi,
> I made the following modifications to utf8.c :
> #ifdef EBCDIC
> uv = NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv);
> #endif
Where in utf8.c? Your description of what you changed is inadequate for
anyone else to understand the context of your change
I forgot to attach the configpm output in the previous
mail.
Thanks
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com --- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I made the fol
Hi,
I made the following modifications to utf8.c :
#ifdef EBCDIC
uv = NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv);
#endif
I get the following output from gmake :
--
`sh cflags "optimize='-g'" utf8.o` utf8.c
CCCMD = c89 -DPERL_CORE -c -DMAXSIG=38
-DOEMVS -D_OE_S
14 matches
Mail list logo
