Re: Problems creating ppd's for use with ppm3

2002-12-18 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: Scott Scecina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:11 AM Subject: RE: Problems creating ppd's for use with ppm3 No, it happens on 5.6.1.633 also. I'd just been telling people to use

RE: Problems creating ppd's for use with ppm3

2002-12-18 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Scott Scecina wrote: No, it happens on 5.6.1.633 also. I'd just been telling people to use ppm(2). Now that I'm rebuilding them for 5.8, I'd like to figure out the problem since ppm(3) is the default... Should the make ppd on 5.8 insert the correct architecture (it

Re: Problems creating ppd's for use with ppm3 - correction.

2002-12-18 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: Sisyphus [EMAIL PROTECTED] But the 'codebase href' requirement seems also to have changed. Instead of just providing the some-package.ppd (which, under ppm2, was all that was required) they are now giving MSWin32-x86-multi-thread-5.8/some-package.ppd.