Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-15 Thread Sastry
Hi I changed the ext/Encode/Makefile.PL with the def_t table to contain iso-8859-16 as follows my %tables = ( def_t = ['ascii.ucm', '8859-1.ucm', '8859-16.ucm', 'null.ucm', 'ctrl.ucm', ] ); a) Now the

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-15 Thread Sastry
Hi This is the verbose output of the lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t test case after my modification in the ext/Encode/Makefile.PL as discussed earlier. 1..26 ok 1 - use DBM_Filter; ok 2 - use SDBM_File; ok 3 - use Fcntl; ok 4 - use charnames; ok 5 - tied to SDBM_File ok 6 - push an illigal filter ok 7

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-15 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi This is the verbose output of the lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t test case after my modification in the ext/Encode/Makefile.PL as discussed earlier. 1..26 ok 1 - use DBM_Filter; ok 2 - use SDBM_File; ok 3 - use Fcntl; ok 4 - use charnames; ok 5 -

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-14 Thread Paul Marquess
What does the verbose output from the encode.t look like once after your change to ext/Encode/Makefile.PL? Paul From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I changed the ext/Encode/Makefile.PL with the def_t table to contain iso- 8859-16 as follows my %tables = ( def_t =

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I agree with you Dan, I was referring to another test lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t where it encodes the k/v pairs using the code page iso-8859-16 and the normal DBM_Filter to store and verify the same. Other tests in DBM_Filter are working fine on

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Dan Kogai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sep 13, 2005, at 07:42 , Paul Marquess wrote: Dan, I'm not sure what is going on here. Can I walk through one of the failing test to see if it rings any bells with you? Before that I would like to make sure if I understand the scope of the

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HI Paul On 9/13/05, Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I agree with you Dan, I was referring to another test lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t where it encodes the k/v pairs using the code page

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Sastry
Hi I agree with you Dan, I was referring to another test lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t where it encodes the k/v pairs using the code page iso-8859-16 and the normal DBM_Filter to store and verify the same. Other tests in DBM_Filter are working fine on EBCDIC platform. Do you remember our previous

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Sastry
HI Paul On 9/13/05, Paul Marquess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I agree with you Dan, I was referring to another test lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t where it encodes the k/v pairs using the code page iso-8859-16 and the normal DBM_Filter to store and

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-13 Thread Sastry
Hi Paul The other tests with DBM_Filter are working fine on EBCDIC platform. The only problem is with lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t and I guess Dan can address this! Dan! The workaround for encode() is not complete. Can you recheck it? -regards Sastry On 9/13/05, Paul Marquess

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 September 2005 06:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dan Kogai Cc: Perl Porters 5 Subject: Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work) Hi Paul Here is the verbose output of the test ok 1 - use DBM_Filter; ok 2 - use SDBM_File; ok 3 - use Fcntl; ok 4 - use

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-12 Thread Sastry
Kogai Cc: Perl Porters 5 Subject: Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work) Hi Dan The patch you had provided calls $_ebcdic_coder-decode($str); and subsequenly calls my $octets = $enc-encode($string,$check); Do you think it is how it is supposed to call on EBCDIC platform? Seems

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-12 Thread Sastry
-- *From:* Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 12 September 2005 06:28 *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dan Kogai *Cc:* Perl Porters 5 *Subject:* Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work) Hi Paul Here is the verbose output of the test ok 1 - use DBM_Filter; ok 2 - use

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Marquess
Dan, I'm not sure what is going on here. Can I walk through one of the failing test to see if it rings any bells with you? I'll use the utf8.t test, because it is a bit more straightforward. I first write these key/value pairs to the DBM file with a utf8 encoding filter in place

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-12 Thread Dan Kogai
On Sep 13, 2005, at 07:42 , Paul Marquess wrote: Dan, I'm not sure what is going on here. Can I walk through one of the failing test to see if it rings any bells with you? Before that I would like to make sure if I understand the scope of the problem correctly. We are talking about the

RE: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-09 Thread Paul Marquess
run it on a Linux/Unix box. $ cd t $ ./TEST -v ../lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t Paul -Original Message- From: Sastry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2005 14:15 To: Dan Kogai Cc: Perl Porters 5 Subject: Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work) Hi Dan The patch you

Re: Encode on EBCDIC patch( Doesn't Work)

2005-09-08 Thread Sastry
Hi Dan The patch you had provided calls $_ebcdic_coder-decode($str); and subsequenly calls my $octets = $enc-encode($string,$check); Do you think it is how it is supposed to call on EBCDIC platform? Seems like this is a work around But there is another test case(lib/DBM_Filter/t/encode.t) in