[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2018-08-06 Thread David Warring via RT
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 07:38:56 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > It was removed completely for 2017.08 release. > > Rakudo commit: > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/465d91abdfda038cb7feda35f7966be4ec39acf3 > Discussion: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-08-21#i_15048995 > On

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-21 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
It was removed completely for 2017.08 release. Rakudo commit: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/465d91abdfda038cb7feda35f7966be4ec39acf3 Discussion: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-08-21#i_15048995 On 2017-08-19 15:31:01, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > I had to revert one of

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-19 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
I had to revert one of the nqp commits related to .parse: https://github.com/perl6/nqp/commit/d4d77b66c46c57de800b147df61fe486b4486acd Here's a ticket for the module that was affected by the change: https://github.com/p6-css/CSS-Module-p6/issues/10 Most certainly we want this change back ASAP,

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-19 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
The change was moved to v6.d in this commit: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/d2278b471cb0bd691dc7a1235fbcb9318ff5d61f On 2017-08-17 08:50:48, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > See this commit: > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/9501edae4f73a970e3270e3b0336a7b3045d3329 > > These

Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:11, Zoffix Znet via RT > wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: >> See this... > > See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were > fallout: > raschipi, gfldex, timtoady

Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 18:11, Zoffix Znet via RT > wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: >> See this... > > See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were > fallout: > raschipi, gfldex, timtoady

Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 17:50, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > # Please include the string: [perl #131919] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > #

Re: [perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 17:50, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > # Please include the string: [perl #131919] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > #

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:11:21 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > To me, it looks like a clear case for 6.d material. We made a promise > to users that we won't make changes that break 6.c-errata changes and > IMO the 6.c-errata roast changes due to this feature break that > promise. Though, since

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:11:21 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > To me, it looks like a clear case for 6.d material. We made a promise > to users that we won't make changes that break 6.c-errata changes and > IMO the 6.c-errata roast changes due to this feature break that > promise. Though, since

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:50:48 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > See this... See also timotimo++'s comment that TimToady cleared a revert if there were fallout: raschipi, gfldex, timtoady already said he'd retract the commit if there's ecosystem fallout, which you just demonstrated

[perl #131919] [RFC] Returning Failure from failed P6-level .parse

2017-08-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #131919] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131919 > See this commit: