[perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

Tests: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/20d67a3d4d

[perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

Tests: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/20d67a3d4d

[perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

You're right, sorry, I should've been more clear. Tickets are not closed without tests, but as you pointed out not everything should be spec-ed. That's correct. Therefore, some tests go to https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/tree/nom/t (these tests can be changed at any moment and don't serve as a

Re: [perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Brad Gilbert via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 08:18:46 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > > https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-10-21#i_15334639 > > > > I' think we should test that both are listed, and we can close

Re: [perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Brad Gilbert via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 08:18:46 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > > https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-10-21#i_15334639 > > > > I' think we should test that both are listed, and we can close

[perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

“I don't think we should force all future implementations to add BUILDALL.” Not sure what this remark is for. Can be rakudo tests. On 2017-10-21 09:12:32, brad wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 08:18:46 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > >

[perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 08:18:46 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-10-21#i_15334639 > > I' think we should test that both are listed, and we can close the > ticket. > I don't think we should force all future implementations to add BUILDALL.

[perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-10-21#i_15334639 I' think we should test that both are listed, and we can close the ticket. On 2017-10-13 04:50:32, elizabeth wrote: > > On 13 Oct 2017, at 07:52, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

> On 13 Oct 2017, at 07:52, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > # Please include the string: [perl #132283] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > #

Re: [perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

> On 13 Oct 2017, at 07:52, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > # Please include the string: [perl #132283] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > #

[perl #132283] [REGRESSION] BUILDALL is listed as one of the methods, maybe that's not right (say $foo.^methods)

# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #132283] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132283 > Code: class Foo { has $.bar }; my $f = Foo.new(bar=>'u'); say