On Saturday 16 April 2005 7:40 pm, Larry Wall wrote:
> : Basically I'm wondering if there's a detailed
> : specification of how <<>> should work.
>
> That's a really good question, and since I don't offhand know the
> right answer, I'll put this up onto the fence so it can topple over
> into p6l-la
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 03:14:50AM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote:
: I actually knew that, but in my head $key_b and $value_b were single words.
: But according to S02, the interpolation is protected by quotes. That is, if
: $key_b is q0/printf "Hello, world\n" or die"/, that's four words, correct? O
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 03:14:50AM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote:
>
> By the way, something tells me perl6-compiler isn't the best place for this
> discussion. Is there a secret group of people that discusses cornercases for
> perl6, and if so could someone tell me on what list they live?
perl6-co
On 16 Apr, Roie Marianer wrote:
: By the way, something tells me perl6-compiler isn't the best place for this
: discussion. Is there a secret group of people that discusses cornercases for
: perl6, and if so could someone tell me on what list they live?
You most likely want perl6-language, where
On Friday 15 April 2005 3:27 am, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:27:27AM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote:
> : > %hash<< a $key_b c >> :key<< a $value_b c >>
> : > %hash« a $key_b c »:key« a $value_b c »
> :
> : Just to be certain, these are both equivalent to
> :
> : @hash{'
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:04:42PM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2005 12:03 am, you wrote:
> > I would rather give you commit rights (we give them out quite
> > liberally) and you could apply it yourself actually. But you should
> > first test your patch against the latest SVN r
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:27:27AM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote:
: > %hash<< a $key_b c >> :key<< a $value_b c >>
: > %hash« a $key_b c »:key« a $value_b c »
: Just to be certain, these are both equivalent to
:
: @hash{'a', $key_b, 'c'} key => ['a', $value_b, 'c']
:
: in Perl 5, righ
On Friday 15 April 2005 3:06 am, Larry Wall wrote:
> Do you mean the behavior of
>
> "%hash" ":key"
>
> or
>
> %hash< a $key_b c > :key< a $value_b c >
>
Thanks. I meant the latter (I got the former right), and that's what I
thought. I'm still not sure exactly how to get it to work, I'll
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:04:42PM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote:
: I did hit a snag with %hash and :key notation for hashes and
: pairs; I'm not sure how to make them interpolate, so for now they just don't.
Do you mean the behavior of
"%hash" ":key"
or
%hash< a $key_b c > :key< a $val
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 12:03 am, you wrote:
> I would rather give you commit rights (we give them out quite
> liberally) and you could apply it yourself actually. But you should
> first test your patch against the latest SVN revision since many many
> many things have changed the past few days.
S
Roie,
On Apr 11, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Roie Marianer wrote:
Hi all.
I'm new here, just downloaded pugs the other day. I noticed only q//,
qq// and
qw// were implemented of the quoting constructs, so I tried my hand at
implementing most of the quoting constructs as specified in S6.
Excellent.
It's not
Hi all.
I'm new here, just downloaded pugs the other day. I noticed only q//, qq// and
qw// were implemented of the quoting constructs, so I tried my hand at
implementing most of the quoting constructs as specified in S6.
It's not the best code in the world (and I think I broke qw// on the way)
12 matches
Mail list logo
