On 11/13/2003 5:54 PM, Ovid wrote:
> --- Michael Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Cosmetically, everything should look almost identical. Behind the scenes I've
>> pretty much gutted and rewritten everything. Most significantly, it no longer
>> requires (uses) the Template Toolkit.
>
> Out of cu
--- Michael Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cosmetically, everything should look almost identical. Behind the scenes I've
> pretty much gutted and rewritten everything. Most significantly, it no longer
> requires (uses) the Template Toolkit.
Out of curiosity, why did you remove Template Toolki
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Michael Carman wrote:
> old format 2192 kB
> new format (default)326 kB
> new format w/ -option=pod,data 391 kB
> new format w/ -option=unified 340 kB
> new format w/ -option=pod,data,unifi
On 11/11/2003 3:19 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 01:27:41PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>>
>> The HTML files generated by Devel::Cover are huge.
>> I think some work should be done to reduce this size.
>
> Michael said he's working on this [...]
My silence on this topic is beca
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 01:27:41PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> The HTML files generated by Devel::Cover are huge.
> I ran coverage on HTML::Template and while the source code
> is ~100K the HTML report is 2.5Mb
>
> So I think some work should be done to reduce this size.
> I made a simple change
Michael Carman said:
> On 10/31/2003 8:08 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I find the POD useful when I'm going thru a Devel::Cover run.
>> I interleave POD with functions and I like to refer to my docs.
>
> Well, since POD is intended to be documentation (not code or even comments)
> it
Personally, I find the POD useful when I'm going thru a Devel::Cover
run. I
interleave POD with functions and I like to refer to my docs.
Well, since POD is intended to be documentation (not code or even
comments) it
seems reasonable to omit it from a coverage report. That said, if I
can find a
On 10/31/2003 8:08 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
>
> Personally, I find the POD useful when I'm going thru a Devel::Cover run. I
> interleave POD with functions and I like to refer to my docs.
Well, since POD is intended to be documentation (not code or even comments) it
seems reasonable to omit it from
I've added functionality to strip POD entirely and to stub blank
lines. I've
also gutted the implementation trying to save characters (literally,
individual
characters) wherever possible. I've got it down to 342 kB. There isn't
much more
room to squeeze stuff out.
Personally, I find the POD use
On 10/25/2003 6:27 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
> The HTML files generated by Devel::Cover are huge.
I'm working on it. :)
> I ran coverage on HTML::Template and while the source code
> is ~100K the HTML report is 2.5Mb
I did a null coverage run (I did a "use HTML::Template" but didn't actually do
a
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:36:03PM -0600, Michael Carman wrote:
> > It is still huge ~870K but I could not find any easy way to remove further
> > large chunks without changing the resulting page.
> You won't find any more low hanging fruit. There's a lot of markup in building
> that table, so it's
On 10/25/2003 6:27 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
> The HTML files generated by Devel::Cover are huge. I think some work should
> be done to reduce this size. I made a simple change - removing leading spaces
> from the templates - this reduced the file size by about 60% for
> HTML::Template.
>
> It is s
12 matches
Mail list logo
