[perl #125294] evalfile NYI

2015-05-30 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #125294] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125294 > >From the Syn: evalfile S29-context/evalfile.t lines 6–21 multi evalfile (Str $filenam

[perl #125019] Roast rakudo skip/todo test:./S19-command-line-options/06-deprecated.t line:14 reason: deprecation message NYI

2015-05-30 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Removed file this was in, rejecting ticket. We don't expect a deprecation warning on features (like command line arg -E) that were in 5 but not in 6. -- Will "Coke" Coleda

[perl #125293] Match objects don't roundtrip through .perl

2015-05-30 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Additionally, there's a test that refers to on the match object, which dies with: This representation (Null) does not support associative access in block at t/spec/S05-match/perl.rakudo.moar:23 That is skipped. -- Will "Coke" Coleda

[perl #125293] Match objects don't roundtrip through .perl

2015-05-30 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #125293] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125293 > There's a failing test in S05-match/perl.t for this. Looks like the topmost "hash" attrib

Re: Perl 5's $0 vs. Perl 6's $*EXECUTABLE_NAME

2015-05-30 Thread Moritz Lenz
Hi, On 05/30/2015 04:36 PM, Paul Cochrane wrote: > Thanks for pointing out the $*PROGRAM omission! I've just added it to the > list of special variables and it should be available online within the next > 10-15 minutes. Minor nit pick: according to the last log on http://doc.perl6.org/build-log/

Re: Perl 5's $0 vs. Perl 6's $*EXECUTABLE_NAME

2015-05-30 Thread Paul Cochrane
Hi Tom, On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:03:17AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tobias Leich wrote: > > Please also take a look at $*EXECUTABLE, $*PROGRAM and $*PROGRAM_NAME. > > Tobias, I didn't find $*PROGRAM in the doc listed by Paul: > > http://doc.perl6.org/langua

Re: Perl 5's $0 vs. Perl 6's $*EXECUTABLE_NAME

2015-05-30 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tobias Leich wrote: >> Please also take a look at $*EXECUTABLE, $*PROGRAM and $*PROGRAM_NAME. > > Tobias, I didn't find $*PROGRAM in the doc listed by Paul: But it is the only one of the group I found in Synop

Re: Perl 5's $0 vs. Perl 6's $*EXECUTABLE_NAME

2015-05-30 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tobias Leich wrote: > Please also take a look at $*EXECUTABLE, $*PROGRAM and $*PROGRAM_NAME. Tobias, I didn't find $*PROGRAM in the doc listed by Paul: http://doc.perl6.org/language/variables#Special_Variables Also, the following were not in: http://tablets

[perl #125290] Possible include path issue

2015-05-30 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by # Please include the string: [perl #125290] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125290 > This is a touch complex, but with the following directory layout (files attached) perl6-readline/li

Re: Perl 5's $0 vs. Perl 6's $*EXECUTABLE_NAME

2015-05-30 Thread Tobias Leich
Please also take a look at $*EXECUTABLE, $*PROGRAM and $*PROGRAM_NAME. Am 30.05.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Tom Browder: > I finally found the Perl 6 version of Perl 5's $0 listed in: > > tablets.perl6.org/appendix-b-grouped.html#special-variables > > as '$*EXECUTABLE_NAME', and I expected it to act t

Re: Perl 5's $0 vs. Perl 6's $*EXECUTABLE_NAME

2015-05-30 Thread Paul Cochrane
On 30 May 2015 3:00:25 pm GMT+02:00, Tom Browder wrote: >I finally found the Perl 6 version of Perl 5's $0 listed in: > > tablets.perl6.org/appendix-b-grouped.html#special-variables > >as '$*EXECUTABLE_NAME', and I expected it to act the same as $0 in >Perl 6, but I have two problems with it: > >

Perl 5's $0 vs. Perl 6's $*EXECUTABLE_NAME

2015-05-30 Thread Tom Browder
I finally found the Perl 6 version of Perl 5's $0 listed in: tablets.perl6.org/appendix-b-grouped.html#special-variables as '$*EXECUTABLE_NAME', and I expected it to act the same as $0 in Perl 6, but I have two problems with it: 1. When used it yields 'perl6' regardless of the script's name (

[perl #125289] [BUG] Array with pair written with the value implicitly True, [:a], won't evaluate (or .perl) properly in Rakudo

2015-05-30 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #125289] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=125289 > m: my %h = a => [a => 1], b => [b => 1, b => 2]; %h.perl.say; %h.perl.EVAL; rakudo-moar