'nmake realclean' broken

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
C:\Programme\Perl\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e rm_f -r blib Unrecognized switch: -r (-h will show valid options). -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/

Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
Not sure if this has already been discussed, but I though this would be a cool option, especially since I've ran into a few cases where this would have been very usefull. Using a scalar (string) with an address to another variable and be able to dereference it. This proves very usefull when

Re: Color codes in tinderbox

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Sterin, Ilya wrote: I haven't done any testing yet, though. It compiles here, too. But 'nmake test' runs as far as t/op/basic..ok t/op/bitwiseok t/op/debuginfo..ok t/op/hacks..ok t/op/integerok t/op/interp.ok t/op/macro..ok

Re: 'nmake realclean' broken

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Sebastian Bergmann wrote: C:\Programme\Perl\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e rm_f -r blib Unrecognized switch: -r (-h will show valid options). 'nmake clean' suffers from the same problem, I just noticed. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/

[PATCH] string_transcode

2002-01-01 Thread Peter Gibbs
I suspect that the length of the output buffer for string_transcode should be based on the output encoding, not on the input encoding. Peter Gibbs EmKel Systems Index: string.c === RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/string.c,v

Re: Large string patch

2002-01-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 06:53:29AM -1000, David Lisa Jacobs wrote: From: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Agreed. I'll probably have the encoding structure provide the terminating bytes. As a side note don't we also have to split UTF-16 into UTF-16BE and UTF-16LE (big endian and little

Re: Color codes in tinderbox

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Sebastian Bergmann wrote: and then test_parrot.exe crashes. By the way: How do I build a debug version of Parrot, so that I could provide a stacktrace? Using MSVC's debugger with the test_parrot.exe that nmake produces unusable results, because no debugging information is in the

[PATCH] -Wall warnings in packfile.c

2002-01-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 10:39:54AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: Folks, I've just made a few minor changes to configure.pl regarding the switches for gcc. Now instead of -Wall being the defaults, it's: -Wall -ansi -pedantic -Wtraditional -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Winline

Re: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:00:22AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: Using a scalar (string) with an address to another variable and be able to dereference it. This proves very usefull when pasing dynamic strings with addresses embeded in them. I don't believe this is available in current perl

[PATCH] Let us JIT, too....

2002-01-01 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
If you're doing 386 assembler, this should work Index: Configure.pl === RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/Configure.pl,v retrieving revision 1.60 diff -r1.60 Configure.pl 98a99 $jitarchname =~ s/i[456]86/i386/i;

RE: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
Not sure, I'll have to take a look at the module, but would it be usefull to include in the standard distro, since this one is not included. I was thinking more of a pragma type usage, sort of like symbolic references can be turned on and off. Or maybe I just feel the sudden urge because of

Re: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: Not sure, I'll have to take a look at the module, but would it be usefull to include in the standard distro Please, no. That definitely counts as more than enough rope. included. I was thinking more of a pragma type usage, sort

Re: [PATCH] It's a trick, sir...

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:57 PM 12/31/2001 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: ...there's *two* of them! It's in there. Thanks. Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
-Original Message- From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:54 AM To: Sterin, Ilya Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Using stringified address On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: Not sure, I'll have to take

Re: Color codes in tinderbox

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Simon Cozens wrote: You'll kick yourself. perl Configure.pl -debugging perl Configure.pl --debugging seems to have no effect on Win32, as of now. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift:

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:33 PM 12/31/2001 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: Index: MANIFEST In, thanks. Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
-Original Message- From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:54 AM To: Sterin, Ilya Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Using stringified address On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: Not sure, I'll have to take

Re: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:58:48AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: I still can't understand why is this such a bad thing, especially if you can check for it with pragmas. I guess I've been reading all this stuff about how dangerous and bad this is, with no explanation. I mean a lot of things are

Re: Color codes in tinderbox

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:24 PM 1/1/2002 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Simon Cozens wrote: You'll kick yourself. perl Configure.pl -debugging perl Configure.pl --debugging seems to have no effect on Win32, as of now. Odd. It should add debugging flags. The hints file hints/mswin32.pl only

Re: [patch] Signed correctness, plus other warnings fixes [1/?]

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 06:12 AM 1/1/2002 -0500, Chip Turner wrote: Well, looks like the body of the message I send mysteriously disappeared, much to my chagrin. Here it is. Patch included inline, as well. Applied, thanks. Dan --it's

interpreter passing (was Re: Large string patch)

2002-01-01 Thread Benjamin Stuhl
--- Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 07:30 AM 12/30/2001 -1000, David Lisa Jacobs wrote: From: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 08:33 PM 12/29/2001 -1000, David Lisa Jacobs wrote: GC will manage all the memory. Everything managed should either be hung off a PMC or an

Re: pointer warnings in interpreter.c

2002-01-01 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Dan and Nick -- [and I did laugh out loud when I finally realised what cunning tricks it is doing to replace the deref function with the pointer to the opcode function, and return the same address so that the run loop calls the real function at that point] It is rather clever, isn't it?

Re: interpreter passing (was Re: Large string patch)

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 09:30 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: --- Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 07:30 AM 12/30/2001 -1000, David Lisa Jacobs wrote: From: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 08:33 PM 12/29/2001 -1000, David Lisa Jacobs wrote: GC will manage all the memory.

[PATCH] -Wall encoding/singlebyte.c

2002-01-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
cc -Wall -I./include -DHAS_JIT -o encodings/singlebyte.o -c encodings/singlebyte.c encodings/singlebyte.c:63: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type encodings/singlebyte.c:65: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type I'm not sure why there is only const on one of

[PATCH] -Wall trace.c

2002-01-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
This patch shuts up this one: cc -Wall -I./include -DHAS_JIT -o trace.o -c trace.c trace.c: In function `trace_op_dump': trace.c:71: warning: enumeration value `PARROT_ARG_OP' not handled in switch Nicholas Clark --- trace.c~Sun Dec 30 12:05:20 2001 +++ trace.c Tue Jan 1 17:47:12

[PATCH] -Wall runops_cores.c

2002-01-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
This shuts this one up cc -Wall -I./include -DHAS_JIT -o runops_cores.o -c runops_cores.c runops_cores.c: In function `runops_slow_core': runops_cores.c:49: warning: implicit declaration of function `trace_op' Nicholas Clark --- runops_cores.c.orig Thu Dec 27 23:24:45 2001 +++

RE: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
-Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 9:59 AM To: Sterin, Ilya; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using stringified address At 11:09 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: Ok, I understand that this hasn't been

Re: [PATCH] Let us JIT, too....

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:25 AM 1/1/2002 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: If you're doing 386 assembler, this should work In, thanks. Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL

RE: Color codes in tinderbox (All tests pass!!!)

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
Mine pass fine... Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.8168.0 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved. D:\Perl\bin\perl.exe t/harness t/op/basic..ok t/op/bitwiseok t/op/debuginfo..ok t/op/hacks..ok

Re: [PATCH] -Wall warnings in packfile.c

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 03:23 PM 1/1/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: The appended patch silences the warnings in what I believe is a correct way [opcode_t will never have more than 32 bits of information, will it? In, thanks. (And no, it won't) Dan

RE: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
-Original Message- From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:12 PM To: 'Dan Sugalski'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using stringified address -Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: [PATCH] -Wall encoding/singlebyte.c

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:27 PM 1/1/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: but that is a more fundamental change than removing the warning by changing just 1 file (as appended). Applied, thanks. Dan --it's like this--- Dan

Re: [PATCH] -Wall runops_cores.c

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:59 PM 1/1/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: This shuts this one up cc -Wall -I./include -DHAS_JIT -o runops_cores.o -c runops_cores.c runops_cores.c: In function `runops_slow_core': runops_cores.c:49: warning: implicit declaration of function `trace_op' Applied, thanks.

Re: [PATCH] -Wall trace.c

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:12 PM 1/1/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: This patch shuts up this one: cc -Wall -I./include -DHAS_JIT -o trace.o -c trace.c trace.c: In function `trace_op_dump': trace.c:71: warning: enumeration value `PARROT_ARG_OP' not handled in switch Applied, thanks.

RE: Using stringified address

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:11 PM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] At 11:09 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote: Ok, I understand that this hasn't been implemented due to the believe that it's a dangerous feature (Programming Perl). But would it be ok

Re: Color codes in tinderbox (All tests pass!!!)

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Sterin, Ilya wrote: Mine pass fine... Current CVS, same crash: http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/parrot.txt -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/

[Patch] - Eliminate extraneous 0 tests

2002-01-01 Thread David Lisa Jacobs
This patch eliminates extraneous 0 tests (because they are unsigned). David Index: encodings/singlebyte.c === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/encodings/singlebyte.c,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -c -r1.8 singlebyte.c ***

Re: [patch] Signed correctness, plus other warnings fixes [1/?]

2002-01-01 Thread David Lisa Jacobs
Actually, I started down this road as well, but thought it would make more sense to make the opcode_t unsigned. This would allow us to keep it a consistent size across platforms if we want. Thoughts? David - Original Message - From: Chip Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Patch] - Eliminate extraneous 0 tests

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 08:40 AM 1/1/2002 -1000, David Lisa Jacobs wrote: This patch eliminates extraneous 0 tests (because they are unsigned). Applied, thanks. Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski

RE: Color codes in tinderbox (All tests pass!!!)

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
I wonder if it matters what current perl version you are using? Also what VC++ and Service Pack are you using as well as your OS. Here is mine... Windows 2000 Professional SP2 ActivePerl 5.6.1 VC++ 6.0 Enterprise SP5 It might not be any of the above, but I thought lets eliminate all other

Re: [patch] Signed correctness, plus other warnings fixes [1/?]

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 08:46 AM 1/1/2002 -1000, David Lisa Jacobs wrote: Actually, I started down this road as well, but thought it would make more sense to make the opcode_t unsigned. This would allow us to keep it a consistent size across platforms if we want. I'd rather opcode_t stays signed--that gives us two

[patch] um.

2002-01-01 Thread Josh Wilmes
This silences these warnings: test_main.c: In function `main': test_main.c:165: warning: passing arg 6 of `mmap' with different width due to p rototype pdump.c: In function `main': pdump.c:55: warning: passing arg 2 of `mmap' as unsigned due to prototype pdump.c:55: warning: passing arg 6 of

Re: Color codes in tinderbox (All tests pass!!!)

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Sterin, Ilya wrote: I wonder if it matters what current perl version you are using? Also what VC++ and Service Pack are you using as well as your OS. MS Windows 2000 Profession, SP-2 MS VisualStudio 6 SP-4 (installing SP-5 soon) c:\homeperl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 6

[PATCH] clean on Win32.

2002-01-01 Thread Jason Diamond
The attached files fix the 'nmake clean' problems on Win32 (and hopefully other non-Unix platforms). Makefile.in needs to be added to parrot/docs. parrot/docs/Makefile needs to be removed. Jason. Makefile.in Description: Binary data clean.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [PATCH] clean on Win32.

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:32 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Jason Diamond wrote: The attached files fix the 'nmake clean' problems on Win32 (and hopefully other non-Unix platforms). Makefile.in needs to be added to parrot/docs. parrot/docs/Makefile needs to be removed. Applied, thanks.

[PATCH] - more encodings cleanup

2002-01-01 Thread David Lisa Jacobs
Got rid of unneeded tmp var and eliminated const from encode prototype since it does make changes to the string. David Index: encodings/singlebyte.c === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/encodings/singlebyte.c,v retrieving revision 1.9

Re: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage

2002-01-01 Thread Jason Diamond
Here's my output: cl -nologo -MD -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT -DHAVE_DES_FCRYPT -DPERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT -DPERL_IMPLICIT_SYS -DPERL_MSVCRT_READFIX-I./i nclu de -Foio/io.obj -c io/io.c io.c io\io.c(323) : warning C4033: 'PIO_close' must return a value

Re: is prederef supposed to be able to segv parrot?

2002-01-01 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:05:44PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: So, what's going wrong, and why all the segvs? I figured it was better to start by wondering about the prederef code. But I might just go to bed instead. Or fix compiler warnings. or perl5 The first segv is the ret in this (test

Re: ParrotIO: Patch attached this time :)

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 06:07 PM 1/1/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. The patch helps. Applied, thanks. Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc warnings, string.h:index()

2002-01-01 Thread Toni Andjelkovic
there are quite a few warnings due to index being defined in string.h: char*rindex (const char *, int) ; include/parrot/vtable.h:31: warning: declaration of `index' shadows global declaration include/parrot/vtable.h:33: warning: declaration of `index' shadows global declaration

[patch] more warnings

2002-01-01 Thread Kevin Falcone
In an attempt to just keep knocking off warnings.. Index: test_main.c === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/test_main.c,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -p -r1.28 test_main.c --- test_main.c 1 Jan 2002 19:49:11 - 1.28 +++

RE: Color codes in tinderbox (All tests pass!!!)

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
Funny, besides the SP-5, which I would bet does not matter, we have identical configs? I'll try to rerun the tests in a minute again, though I've already successfully ran them twice. Ilya -Original Message- From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

io_os.c undeclared identifier

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
io_os.c(127) : error C2065: 'F_GETFL' : undeclared identifier With the latest CVS, after the ParrotIO patch. Ilya

Re: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage

2002-01-01 Thread Melvin Smith
At 03:33 PM 1/1/2002 -0800, Jason Diamond wrote: Here's my output: cl -nologo -MD -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT -DHAVE_DES_FCRYPT -DPERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT -DPERL_IMPLICIT_SYS -DPERL_MSVCRT_READFIX-I./i nclu de -Foio/io.obj -c io/io.c io.c io\io.c(323) : warning C4033:

io.c problem and patch

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
Small patch to return a value in io.c PIO_close(). 323c323 return 1; --- return;

RE: io.c problem and patch

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
Oooopss, sorry. Disregard this, since Melvin just submitted the actual correct version:-) Ilya -Original Message- From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: io.c problem and patch Small patch to return

RE: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
-Original Message- From: Melvin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:58 PM To: Jason Diamond; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage At 03:33 PM 1/1/2002 -0800, Jason Diamond wrote:

RE: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage

2002-01-01 Thread Melvin Smith
io\io_os.c(127) : error C2065: 'F_GETFL' : undeclared identifier NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2' Stop. With the #if 0 you can get a compile, can you test this simple pasm code? puts This is STDOUT\n end Btw, I checked over Perl5 source, they of

RE: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 09:46 PM 1/1/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: io\io_os.c(127) : error C2065: 'F_GETFL' : undeclared identifier NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2' Stop. With the #if 0 you can get a compile, can you test this simple pasm code? puts This is STDOUT\n

RE: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
It compiled fine with #if 0, but now interp1.t hangs. Ilya P.S. I have to step away for a few, but I'll be back to test the rest in an hour or so. -Original Message- From: Melvin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 6:46 PM To: Sterin, Ilya; 'Jason

interp failures in the new IO system

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
Dunno if this is affecting anyone else, but I'm finding the test suite hangs on cygwin with the new IO code in the interp tests. That's mine and sort of busted, but something to keep in mind. Dan --it's like

Re: interp failures in the new IO system

2002-01-01 Thread Melvin Smith
At 10:09 PM 1/1/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: Dunno if this is affecting anyone else, but I'm finding the test suite hangs on cygwin with the new IO code in the interp tests. That's mine and sort of busted, but something to keep in mind. Dan

Re: interp failures in the new IO system

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:22 PM 1/1/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: See if this helps the freeze... FWIW, I just got VC++ working on my Win2000 and the test worked ok. No joy, sorry. Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski

Re: interp failures in the new IO system

2002-01-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:30 PM 1/1/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 10:22 PM 1/1/2002 -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: See if this helps the freeze... FWIW, I just got VC++ working on my Win2000 and the test worked ok. No joy, sorry. I just stubbed the test out so the tinderbox clients won't wedge too hard on it.

[FIXED] Was: Re: interp failures in the new IO system

2002-01-01 Thread Melvin Smith
This fixes the freeze by only initializing ParrotIO once. Also added a little sanity check in the layer push sub. This is just a kludge, I'll work on per Interpreter IO stack when we discuss it a little more. -Melvin --- io.c.orig Tue Jan 1 21:54:35 2002 +++ io.cTue Jan 1 21:53:29

TODOs for STRINGs

2002-01-01 Thread David Lisa Jacobs
Here is a short list of TODOs that I came up with for STRINGs. First, do these look good to people? And second, what is the preferred method for keeping track of these (patch to the TODO file, entries in bug tracking system, mailing list, etc. * Add set ops that are encoding aware (e.g., set

[PATCH] - small string patch

2002-01-01 Thread David Lisa Jacobs
This is just a small simplification. David Index: string.c === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/string.c,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -c -r1.35 string.c *** string.c 1 Jan 2002 17:53:50 - 1.35 --- string.c 2 Jan 2002 05:09:45

Re: One of these things is not like the others...

2002-01-01 Thread Robert Spier
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 10:11:38AM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: Bryan -- Mixed modes for *.pl scripts in the main directory. Should all probably be 0644. Changing them directly in the repository should help. $ chmod 0644 *.pl,v Done. -R

Re: We're all just Parrot Troopers

2002-01-01 Thread Robert Spier
An updated TODO list is needed. As is maybe a reminder on bugs.perl.org. bugs6.perl.org The things that I want to happen for 0.0.4 are not sexy. They are I've added the 0.0.4 goals to http://www.parrotcode.org/todo -R

RE: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage

2002-01-01 Thread Sterin, Ilya
-Original Message- From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 10:05 PM To: 'Melvin Smith'; 'Jason Diamond'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage It compiled fine with #if 0,

.cvsignore

2002-01-01 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
... seems not to be missing some files. nmake testclean nmake realclean cvs upd -dAP ? pdump.ilk ? pdump.pdb ? test_parrot.ilk ? test_parrot.pdb ? vc60.pdb ? classes/vc60.pdb cvs server: Updating . cvs server: Updating Parrot cvs server: Updating Parrot/Jit cvs server: Updating

Re: TODOs for STRINGs

2002-01-01 Thread Peter Gibbs
- Original Message - From: David Lisa Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add transcoding ops (this might be a specific case of the previous e.g., set S0, S1, unicode, utf-16) Note that there is still a bug in string_transcode as of string.c 1.35; I have repeated a patch below. I tested this

Re: TODOs for STRINGs

2002-01-01 Thread David Lisa Jacobs
From: Peter Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add size of string termination to encodings (i.e., how many 0 bytes) Should string termination be required? If strings are assumed to be terminated, it seems to me that precludes buffer re-use (copy-on-write) for substrings. On the other hand, passing