What does "restart" mean in op files, as in "restart ADDRESS(resume);"?
Also, why does the find_global op use it? I couldn't find it explained
anywhere.
Also, on a vaguely related topic, in "Parrot_jit_cpcf_op", what does
"cpcf" stand for?
JEff
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
>
> > When you invoke a Coroutine, it calls swap_context()
>
> Can you have a look at imcc/t/syn/pcc.t, there is an coroutine
> iterator test.
Yep, it has the same problem. The patch below expose
Harry Jackson wrote:
I am now trying to get Parrot running on debian and have noticed the
following error while running "perl Configure.pl"
Determining some sizes...Linker failed (see test.ldo) at
lib/Parrot/Configure/Step.pm line 233
Parrot::Configure::Step::cc_build() called at
config
At 07:36 PM 1/9/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:01 AM 1/9/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Which is why I hoped people would pitch in and help fix the tests.
Its not tests only. There's already production code out there using
Parrot - ask Dan
At 08:44 PM 1/9/2004 +, Harry Jackson wrote:
Melvin Smith wrote:
But, if you want macros to stay, let them stay.
So, are they staying, staying for now or not sure yet? I have a few
hundred lines of imcc that uses macros and if they are being removed then
I would rather change now and save mys
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:01 AM 1/9/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>Melvin, that's not the way to go. We can remove them from the lexer,
>>when we have an external substitute. Just removing it breaks a lot of
>>existing code. Failing tests may hide other problems and so o
Melvin Smith wrote:
But, if you want macros to stay, let them stay.
So, are they staying, staying for now or not sure yet? I have a few
hundred lines of imcc that uses macros and if they are being removed
then I would rather change now and save myself some pain later.
H
:)
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Very rarely would you not savetop before creating a *real* continuation.
> But again, very rarely would you actually create a *real* continuation
> (depending on your language). RetContinuations are almost always a
> better choice for traditional languages
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > newsub $P1, .Continuation, done
>
> For returning just use a .RetContinuation. Or still better, just omit
> $P1 totally here:
>
> > .pcc_call $P0, $P1
Aha! I like that even better. :) Thanks!
Sin
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Jeff Clites wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> #!/bin/env parrot
> >> #
> >> # yieldbug.imc
> >> #
> >> # This program should print dots forever.
> >> # Instead it prints a few dots and then segfault
At 09:01 AM 1/9/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMCC macros are gone. Volunteers feel free to reimplement a
> pre-processor (outside of IMCC) using the macro expansion code
> that was removed from IMCC.
Melvin, that's not the way to go. We can remo
At 08:58 AM 1/9/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This also means .pasm files won't be able to .include these anymore,
> you'd have to use IMC.
Why not just make .const work in both modes?
Because pure PASM doesn't currently use type names.
.const expects
Leopold Toetsch writes:
> Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... I'm not
> > against somebody else maintaining the patch in the meantime :-)
>
> I went again through the patch and the original one from Sept, 5th. But
> it seems that one thing is missing in both:
>
> *If* all PMCs which n
Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch adds some .cvsignore files to the recently added 'languages/m4'.
> It tells CVS that is OK to have a generated Makefile and generated test
> input and result files.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Jeff Clites writes:
> On Jan 9, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> >Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>#!/bin/env parrot
> >>#
> >># yieldbug.imc
> >>#
> >># This program should print dots forever.
> >># Instead it prints a few dots and then segfaults.
> >
> >It does print do
On Jan 9, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#!/bin/env parrot
#
# yieldbug.imc
#
# This program should print dots forever.
# Instead it prints a few dots and then segfaults.
It does print dots forever here.
It does for me too. But based on a previo
Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
> When you invoke a Coroutine, it calls swap_context()
Can you have a look at imcc/t/syn/pcc.t, there is an coroutine iterator
test.
leo
Michal Wallace writes:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > .sub __main__
> > newsub $P0, .Closure, _func
> > savetop
> > newsub $P0, .Continuation, done
> >
> > So the restoretop after the invoke has something to pop (and so your
> > register state isn't screwed up when you get
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .sub __main__
> newsub $P0, .Closure, _func
> savetop
No - not for plain subroutines/closures.
> Or you could do as PCC does and use a .RetContinuation, which doesn't
> close over the stacks, when you don't actually need a full continuation.
Yep.
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMCC macros are gone. Volunteers feel free to reimplement a
> pre-processor (outside of IMCC) using the macro expansion code
> that was removed from IMCC.
Melvin, that's not the way to go. We can remove them from the lexer,
when we have an external s
Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> newsub $P1, .Continuation, done
For returning just use a .RetContinuation. Or still better, just omit
$P1 totally here:
> .pcc_call $P0, $P1
leo
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This also means .pasm files won't be able to .include these anymore,
> you'd have to use IMC.
Why not just make .const work in both modes?
> -Melvin
leo
Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #!/bin/env parrot
> #
> # yieldbug.imc
> #
> # This program should print dots forever.
> # Instead it prints a few dots and then segfaults.
It does print dots forever here.
leo
Hey all,
When you invoke a Coroutine, it calls swap_context()
from src/sub.c ... There's an else clause in there
that either swaps or restores theinterpreter stack,
but as far as I can tell, swap_context() is ONLY
called when entering a coroutine - not when we're
suspending it. That means all so
25 matches
Mail list logo
