Graciliano M. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm thinking is that in Parrot, as is in Perl, we have dynamic data
structures, like dynamic HASH and ARRAYs, with SCALARs that can grow as they
want. To write our code this help a lot, but some parts of our algorithms
need memory and speed,
Graciliano M. P. wrote:
Will be nice to can write this directly on Perl6:
int the_matrix[10][10] ;
Perl6 and thus Parrot supports arrays of native types like int and
bitarrays.
Also, will be nice to can use the same idea with hash tables:
int , bool static_hash{1000} ;
But while plain
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for not being about for quite a while. Time to get Parrot building
fully on Win32 again. :-)
Great, thanks.
libparrot.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol Parrot_setflag
Obsolete API - isn't existing anymore. Removed.
leo
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #33589]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33589
Hi,
on http://www.parrotcode.org/patchfaq.html there is a new mail
Graciliano M. P. writes:
Will be nice to can write this directly on Perl6:
int the_matrix[10][10] ;
Or rather:
my int @matrix is dim(10,10);
Perl 6 has been planning support for such naive data structures for a
long time.
I'm not sure about hashes. They have enough internal
Thanks for trying this out. I assume that you're trying the ponie-2 tarball
from CPAN? If so, that's somewhat out of date, so this might be part of
the problems (but not all, I suspect).
All the errors you've reported so far appear to come from parrot, rather than
being ponie specific so it's
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libparrot.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol Parrot_setflag
Obsolete API - isn't existing anymore. Removed.
OK, with the attached patch (which feels kinda hacky, but works) the build
completes.
Yes, I was using a regular expression, not a rules. =-)
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:09:10PM -0500, William Coleda wrote:
I'd like to get Tcl's [namespace] implemented, but this will be very
difficult until I can do:
$P0 = split ::+, $S0
or something equivalent with PGE.
