# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34675]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34675 >
Trying to track down a different problem, I just did a fresh checkout on OS X
and got t
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34672]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34672 >
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-
At 04:00 PM 4/4/2005, via RT wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Chip Salzenberg
# Please include the string: [perl #34669]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34669 >
The creators of flex were rather mean to go and chan
# New Ticket Created by Chip Salzenberg
# Please include the string: [perl #34669]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34669 >
The creators of flex were rather mean to go and change the internal
API without even
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cvsuser 05/04/04 07:13:43
> Fix calling signature so it's in line with leo's recent change of I->J.
>
> Index: parrotinterpreter.pmc
Argh. I must have again "fixed" parrotinterpreter.c - I do remember
these changes.
Thanks for the ci and sorry,
le
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:00:20PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Currently, config/gen/makefiles/root.in says:
>
> TOUCH = $(PERL) -e ${PQ}open(A,qq{>>$$_}) or die foreach @ARGV${PQ}
>
> However, this fails for my source tree. I habitually leave
> CVS-controlled files write-only until t
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:00:20PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Currently, config/gen/makefiles/root.in says:
>
> TOUCH = $(PERL) -e ${PQ}open(A,qq{>>$$_}) or die foreach @ARGV${PQ}
>
> However, this fails for my source tree. I habitually leave
> CVS-controlled files write-only until t
Currently, config/gen/makefiles/root.in says:
TOUCH = $(PERL) -e ${PQ}open(A,qq{>>$$_}) or die foreach @ARGV${PQ}
However, this fails for my source tree. I habitually leave
CVS-controlled files write-only until they are locally modified.
(This is "cvs -r" behavior, also triggered by expor
During class registration of classes that define a MMD_init table,
several new things happen:
1) a MultiSub PMC is created in the "__parrot_core" namespace once
2a) if there is just one MMD variant:
a NCI method is created in the classes namespace
2b) if there are more then one MMD variants
The NCI signature char 'I' used to be the Parrot Interpreter. It's now
'J'. This frees 'I' for its new and more consistent meaning INTVAL.
Classes that use the newer METHOD syntax don't need a change. Old code
that uses enter_nci_method() and uses an Bnterpreter argument should
be changed to us
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>> There's gotta be at least one element in the array. Not sure why this
>>> compiles on other platforms, though.
>> gcc hasn't problems with it. Dunno what the standard says.
> MS VC++ has an error code "C2466 - cannot allocate a
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .sub main @MAIN
> $S0 = unicode:"\"]\nif I3 == "
> .end
> Generates:
> encodings/utf8.c:277: failed assertion `i->bytepos < PObj_buflen(s) - 4'
Slightly wrong assert. I've moved it after the advance of the bytepos
now.
> 2) The fact that the diagnosti
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .sub main @MAIN
> $P0 = new Integer
> store_global "Foo", unicode:"Bar", $P0
> print "ok 1\n"
> .end
> It generates the error:
> unimplemented unicode
Yep. charset/unicode.c:compute_hash() *was* unimplemented.
leo
Roger Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>
>> As @ARGS (or @IN_ARGS, @OUT_ARGS) is being stored in the context, and
>> that context is defacto the continuation, yes - a tail-call would
>> inherit this information.
>>
>> leo
> But as each tail-call supplies a new @ARGS, how c
At 18:01 02/04/2005 +, you wrote:
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or even:
> nmake win32-installer
> ?
> The Windows equivalent of "rpm" would be "msi".
Maybe then:
nmake win32-inno-installer
I agree with you, 'win32-inno-installer' is a better target name than 'setup'.
Do you w
15 matches
Mail list logo
