MrJoltCola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
* What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
darwin
linux-x86-gcc3.*
win32-ms-cl
You should
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Roger Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
As @ARGS (or @IN_ARGS, @OUT_ARGS) is being stored in the context, and
that context is defacto the continuation, yes - a tail-call would
inherit this information.
But as each tail-call supplies a new @ARGS, how can
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 22:28 -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to MrJoltCola:
At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
* What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
darwin
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to MrJoltCola:
At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
* What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
darwin
linux-x86-gcc3.*
At 03:21 AM 4/7/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
MrJoltCola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
* What platforms are required for release? I'd guess that we'd get
almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
darwin
According to MrJoltCola:
I can tell you now Sparc / GCC is broken for most due to our broken
Configure. Our config pulls out the params that were used to build
Perl with, and this is invalid because most Sparc folks are running
a pre-built Perl and GCC binary that was built on a distributor's
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, MrJoltCola wrote:
Where did Tinderbox go anyway? I don't mind running a tinderclient at all.
i ran a tinderclient on my ultra 60 for a while before the tinderbox went
away. i think i was the only solaris box out there, and i'd be more than
happy to run it again when and if
At 11:03 05/04/2005 +0200, you wrote:
Please verify the build on Windows platforms,
$ perl Configure.pl -cc=gcc --without-icu
$ mingw32-make
Build OK with MinGW.
Francois
thanks
leo
The latest Parrot CVS checkout segfaults for me on the following code:
.sub _main
.local pmc foo
foo = new Integer
foo = 3
# new_pad 0
store_lex foo, foo
end
.end
It appears that the store_lex opcode is to blame - when no lexical pad
has been created and you
i've attached a patch to update the pcre example, libraries, and added some documentation and simple tests.
notably, the pcre library now uses current calling conventions, and is designed to work on win32 and unix.
i do not have a unix test environment, so please test there before applying.
if
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:59:41AM -0400, Jeff Horwitz wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, MrJoltCola wrote:
Where did Tinderbox go anyway? I don't mind running a tinderclient at all.
i ran a tinderclient on my ultra 60 for a while before the tinderbox went
away. i think i was the only solaris
According to Peter Sinnott:
I set up a tinder server a couple of weeks ago.
Not sure if anyone else looks at it.
http://unlinked.vm.bytemark.co.uk/tinder//parrot/status.html
I understand that tinderbox is an automated system for test builds
with result collation. Is there any need for a
wouldn't you know it... i upload the wrong patch. here's the correct one, with all tests passing on win32.
On Apr 7, 2005 9:00 AM, jerry gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've attached a patch to update the pcre example, libraries, and added some documentation and simple tests.
notably, the pcre
At 12:32 PM 4/7/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Peter Sinnott:
I set up a tinder server a couple of weeks ago.
Not sure if anyone else looks at it.
http://unlinked.vm.bytemark.co.uk/tinder//parrot/status.html
I understand that tinderbox is an automated system for test builds
with
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Is there already a configuration roadmap, something for me to start with
as I look to What Should Be?
I'm not aware of one. There's been lots of discussion over the years both
on the perl6-internals list and on the now-defunct perl6-build list, but
but
Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to MrJoltCola:
I can tell you now Sparc / GCC is broken for most due to our broken
Configure. Our config pulls out the params that were used to build
Perl with, and this is invalid because most Sparc folks are running
a pre-built Perl
According to Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon:
From what I recall, we're planning a bootstrapping system. The
configuration/build system will be written in a Parrot language
(possibly, but not necessarily, Perl 6), with PBC files included in
the distribution. To bootstrap, we'll have
# test_pbc.php
?php
function test_pbc(){
print hello parrot;
}
?
if compile test_pbc.php to test_pbc.pbc then how use this pbc for perl.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use test_pbc; # ?
test_pbc(); # ?
From: Roger Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:23:41 -0400
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Roger Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
As @ARGS (or @IN_ARGS, @OUT_ARGS) is being stored in the context, and
that context is defacto the continuation,
It was on parrotcode or dev.perl.org at some point.
Maybe that can be reused?
Our tinderbox.perl.org volunteer is working on it. We've been nudging
him, and he's got some cool stuff going on.
Due to popular demand, among many other reasons, parrot will be
switching to Subversion at some point in the next few days.
I've placed a test conversion at https://svn.perl.org/parrot-test/
(It mirrors the state of the CVS repository as of this morning.)
Please take a look at it, and make
There are two open tickets about removing the core's dependance on Perl* PMCs,
and instead, making them dynamically loadable and using the language agnostic
PMCs for internal use.
Talking about this with Leo on IRC, he expressed an interest in getting these
changes in chunks to make them a
Robert Spier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any questions?
I assume current committer bits will be transitioned over too?
--
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perl and Parrot hacker
I used to have a life, but I liked mail-reading so much better.
Any questions?
I assume current committer bits will be transitioned over too?
Actually, this would be a great time to get signed committer
agreements from everyone. But, since that probably isn't going to
happen, I'll just move over all the bits.
-R
24 matches
Mail list logo
