On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 03:47:27PM +0200, NotFound wrote:
> >> Defining the hash entries for the subs in PIR syntax is awful.
> >> So I envision Makefile.pl, Makefile.nqp or Makefile.p6 for this syntax.
> >> For p6 we must ensure that every parrot package has a perl6 also then. Not
> >> good.
> >>
Resolved.
On Fri Sep 12 02:18:57 2008, bernhard wrote:
> James Keenan via RT schrieb:
> > I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution.
> >
> > And that's where discussion left off three months ago. I am
> > recommending the following:
> >
> > (1) Mark this ticket resolved.
> > (2) Condu
>> Defining the hash entries for the subs in PIR syntax is awful.
>> So I envision Makefile.pl, Makefile.nqp or Makefile.p6 for this syntax.
>> For p6 we must ensure that every parrot package has a perl6 also then. Not
>> good.
>> So pl, pir or the simple nqp.
>
> The libs and scripts could be writ
Reini Urban via RT schrieb:
Defining the hash entries for the subs in PIR syntax is awful.
So I envision Makefile.pl, Makefile.nqp or Makefile.p6 for this syntax.
For p6 we must ensure that every parrot package has a perl6 also then. Not good.
So pl, pir or the simple nqp.
The libs and script
James Keenan via RT schrieb:
I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
configuration steps which probed for features only used in
2008/6/22 jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> James Keenan via RT schrieb:
>>>
>>> On Fri Jul 13 09:58:33 2007, bernhard wrote:
>>>
There are several config probes that are only used for language
imple
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:47 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
> that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
> originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
> c
I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
configuration steps which probed for features only used in specific
language implementati
On Sun Jun 22 03:39:37 2008, bernhard wrote:
>
> So 'has_gnu_m4' is not essential to the implementation of 'Parrot m4'.
> In r28633 I removed the use of 'has_gnu_m4' and the config step
> auto::m4.pm can now be removed.
>
Done. Patch applied in r28656
> But the real scope of ticket RT#43857
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Keenan via RT schrieb:
>>
>> On Fri Jul 13 09:58:33 2007, bernhard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> There are several config probes that are only used for language
>>> implementations.
>>> Examples are config/auto/m4.pm and c
James Keenan via RT schrieb:
On Fri Jul 13 09:58:33 2007, bernhard wrote:
There are several config probes that are only used for language
implementations.
Examples are config/auto/m4.pm and config/auto/python.pm.
Please find attached two files. The first greps the repository for
men
On Fri Jul 13 09:58:33 2007, bernhard wrote:
> There are several config probes that are only used for language
> implementations.
> Examples are config/auto/m4.pm and config/auto/python.pm.
>
> In order to improve the seperation of concerns, these probes should be
> moved to a
> separate directo
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #43857]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43857 >
There are several config probes that are only used for language
implementations
14 matches
Mail list logo
