On Fri Nov 14 11:42:02 2008, bernhard wrote:
On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote:
On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, it is
apparent
that there's enough bit rot in tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl that
it
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM, James Keenan via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri Nov 14 11:42:02 2008, bernhard wrote:
On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote:
On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, it is
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my way of thinking, deprecation is for parrot features, not
developer tools, so I don't think we need to follow the same rules
here. (But if I'm overruled, we need to decide before the release this
Tuesday.)
I would
Will Coleda wrote:
Is the smoke server still used?
Can support for the smoke server be dropped?
+1 from me; I vote for smolder.
+1, on not maintaining two independent solutions for the same problem.
Allison
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote:
On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, it is
apparent
that there's enough bit rot in
On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, it is apparent
that there's enough bit rot in tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl that it
needs a refactoring. And since there are no unit/regression tests for
this program, it's going to