Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
Is this something we want to go ahead with or should this ticket be
rejected?
I've had it on my hiveminder todo list for over a month now. The problem
is, it's not only a matter of annoying fiddly bookkeeping work now, it's
also annoying fiddly bookkeeping work
On Mon Sep 08 01:18:37 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
Is this something we want to go ahead with or should this ticket be
rejected?
I've had it on my hiveminder todo list for over a month now. The problem
is, it's not only a matter of annoying fiddly
On Fri Apr 04 16:52:39 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri Apr 04 04:30:17 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One (possibly solvable) problem is that subversion tags don't
substitute properly in the HTML generated versions on the website
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:21:56 -0700
Mark Glines via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:18:47 -0700
James Keenan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Datestamps in the filename (e.g., MMDD)? Or somewhere inside
the
file?
Datestamps in the file, something like in the Perl 6
On Fri Apr 04 04:30:17 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One (possibly solvable) problem is that subversion tags don't
substitute properly in the HTML generated versions on the website
http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/pdd/pdd07_codingstd.html.
What code do we use to generate those pages?
How
It would be very helpful to me if the PDD's had date stamps. They
evolve and I'm never sure that I'm not reading one that is seriously
out of date.
Datestamps in the filename (e.g., MMDD)? Or somewhere inside the file?
Wouldn't the former create repository problems?
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:18:47 -0700
James Keenan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Datestamps in the filename (e.g., MMDD)? Or somewhere inside the
file?
Wouldn't the former create repository problems?
Couldn't the latter be done automatically with an $Id$ tag?
Mark
