On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 06:15:54PM +0200, K Stol wrote:
| It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate name for this
| stuff. While event is the right thing in some places it isn't in
| others (like the whole attribute/property mess) we may be well-served
| choosing another name. I'm
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Events (I think we need a new name)
Matt Fowles wrote:
I think Page already has a different meaning in computers,
namely a page of memory.
Not to mention a web page.
For what it is worth, I support event as the name.
Being as I think I'm largely responsible
: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Events (I think we need a new name)
Okay, so I'm working on redoing the events document based on the
critiques from folks so far. (Which have been quite helpful) I should
have a second draft of the thing soon.
It does, though, sound like we
I LOVE IT: PARrot Container for Event Lobbing!!!
-Original Message-
From: Andy Wardley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 7:36 AM
To: Butler, Gerald
Cc: 'Gordon Henriksen'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Events (I think we need a new name) - Parcel
Butler, Gerald wrote:
How about: tocsin
[...thinking out loud...]
I'm not sure it's a good idea to use an obscure word, even if it is
appropriate to the usage. It should be a word that the average user
would recognise, and hopefully be able to intuit some sense of what it
does.
How about
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 06:27, Rachwal Waldemar-AWR001 wrote:
It seems the name 'event' is not as bad. So, maybe 'Pevent', stands for 'parrot
event'?
One advantage... it'd be easy searchable. I recall a pain whenever I searched for
'thread', or 'Icon'.
If you're talking about search engines,
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, so I'm working on redoing the events document based on the
critiques from folks so far. (Which have been quite helpful) I should
have a second draft of the thing soon.
It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate name for this
stuff. While event is the right
All~
I think Page already has a different meaning in computers, namely a page
of memory. This one might be going to far afield for names. For what it
is worth, I support event as the name.
Matt
James Mastros wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, so I'm working on redoing the events document
Matt Fowles wrote:
I think Page already has a different meaning in computers,
namely a page of memory.
Not to mention a web page.
For what it is worth, I support event as the name.
Being as I think I'm largely responsible for the sense that the name
needs to be changed, I should point out
On 12 May 2004, at 17:38, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
It's Parrot telling you that something happened.
Squawk?
Mike
Okay, so I'm working on redoing the events document based on the
critiques from folks so far. (Which have been quite helpful) I should
have a second draft of the thing soon.
It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate name for this
stuff. While event is the right thing in some
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, so I'm working on redoing the events document based on the
critiques from folks so far. (Which have been quite helpful) I should
have a second draft of the thing soon.
It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate name for this
stuff. While event is the
Dan Sugalski wrote:
It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate name for this
stuff. While event is the right thing in some places it isn't in others
(like the whole attribute/property mess) we may be well-served choosing
another name. I'm open to suggestions here...
Notice? (Too
Dan Sugalski wrote:
It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate name for this
stuff. While event is the right thing in some places it isn't in others
(like the whole attribute/property mess) we may be well-served choosing
another name. I'm open to suggestions here...
incident?
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 12:08, Dan Sugalski wrote:
It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate name for this
stuff. While event is the right thing in some places it isn't in
others (like the whole attribute/property mess) we may be well-served
choosing another name. I'm open to
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 12:08:08PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, so I'm working on redoing the events document based on the
critiques from folks so far. (Which have been quite helpful) I should
have a second draft of the thing soon.
It does, though, sound like we might want an alternate
16 matches
Mail list logo