At 3:42 PM -0500 12/11/03, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 03:05 PM 12/11/2003 -0500, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
my $foo = Oracle::Instance::DEV1::db_block_buffers;
The namespace lookup in Oracle::Init checks the Oracle config
parameters which is external code.
All
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 12:05, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> It is truly remarkable the lengths that Perl programmers seem to be
> willing go to in order to hide a function call or obscure the existence
> of an object. :)
Not all of the poly- and allomorphism in the world comes from
"traditional" objec
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my $foo = Oracle::Instance::DEV1::db_block_buffers;
>
> The namespace lookup in Oracle::Init checks the Oracle config
> parameters which is external code.
>
> All sorts of neat possibilities. :)
It is truly remarkable the lengths that Perl programmers
At 03:05 PM 12/11/2003 -0500, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my $foo = Oracle::Instance::DEV1::db_block_buffers;
>
> The namespace lookup in Oracle::Init checks the Oracle config
> parameters which is external code.
>
> All sorts of neat possibilities. :)
It is t
I think a heirarchy is a good idea for namespacing in general. I've
always wanted to be able to tie namespaces in Perl 5. It would only
make sense that if I tie Foo::, that Foo::anything:: would also go
through that tie to get the anything:: stash.
What do you mean by "tie" here? Are you talking
On Dec 10, 2003, at 12:37 AM, Luke Palmer wrote:
Dan Sugalski writes:
At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
set I2, P1["Foo\x00i"] # I1 == I2
gets currently the attribute idx (0) of "$Foo::i".
Q: Should the assembler mangle the "Foo::i" to "Foo\0i"
I don't like it either, but
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:26:04PM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 12:16 PM 12/10/2003 +, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >*{"Foo\0Bar\0Baz"}->{var};
> >or
> >*{"Foo\0Bar\0Baz\0var"};
> >
> [snip]
> >I think Dan was proposing the first and that's fine.
> >I think the second would be a mistak
At 11:34 AM 12/10/2003 -0600, Robert Eaglestone wrote:
Quoth Melvin Smith:
>It be a bit friendlier to make the scope resolution operator something
^^ ACK
>that at least 1 or 2 languages use as their own already; then all the rest
>still have to mangle.
Uh oh, time to vote?
Voting for my
Quoth Melvin Smith:
>It be a bit friendlier to make the scope resolution operator something
>that at least 1 or 2 languages use as their own already; then all the rest
>still have to mangle.
Uh oh, time to vote?
At 12:16 PM 12/10/2003 +, Tim Bunce wrote:
*{"Foo\0Bar\0Baz"}->{var};
or
*{"Foo\0Bar\0Baz\0var"};
[snip]
I think Dan was proposing the first and that's fine.
I think the second would be a mistake.
Using a character that won't collide with HLL has a disadvantage
in the general
At 01:37 AM 12/10/2003 -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
Dan Sugalski writes:
> At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > set I2, P1["Foo\x00i"] # I1 == I2
> >
> >gets currently the attribute idx (0) of "$Foo::i".
> >Q: Should the assembler mangle the "Foo::i" to "Foo\0i"
>
> I don't li
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:37:22AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> I think a heirarchy is a good idea for namespacing in general. I've
> always wanted to be able to tie namespaces in Perl 5. It would only
> make sense that if I tie Foo::, that Foo::anything:: would also go
> through that tie to ge
Dan Sugalski writes:
> At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > set I2, P1["Foo\x00i"] # I1 == I2
> >
> >gets currently the attribute idx (0) of "$Foo::i".
> >Q: Should the assembler mangle the "Foo::i" to "Foo\0i"
>
> I don't like it either, but the alternative is to impose an
On Dec 9, 2003, at 3:40 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 5:46 PM +0100 12/5/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
set I2, P1["Foo\x00i"] # I1 == I2
gets currently the attribute idx (0) of "$Foo::i".
Q: Should the as
At 5:46 PM +0100 12/5/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
set I2, P1["Foo\x00i"] # I1 == I2
gets currently the attribute idx (0) of "$Foo::i".
Q: Should the assembler mangle the "Foo::i" to "Foo\0i"
Someth
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> set I2, P1["Foo\x00i"] # I1 == I2
>>
>>gets currently the attribute idx (0) of "$Foo::i".
>>Q: Should the assembler mangle the "Foo::i" to "Foo\0i"
> Something about this embedded \0 character
>
At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
set I2, P1["Foo\x00i"] # I1 == I2
gets currently the attribute idx (0) of "$Foo::i".
Q: Should the assembler mangle the "Foo::i" to "Foo\0i"
Something about this embedded \0 character
bugs me. I know its what Dan has in the design doc but
i
17 matches
Mail list logo
