Re: [perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-12-21 Thread Ron Blaschke
Will Coleda wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, James Keenan via RT parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org wrote: Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files on the OpenBSD Smolder tester: http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135 But,

Re: [perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-12-21 Thread Ron Blaschke
James Keenan via RT wrote: On Wed Jul 30 16:58:55 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote: t/op/arithmetics.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t For the record, according to our Smolder reports for MSWin32, these 3 files have tests that are either still TODO-ed out or are failing outright on some

Re: [perl #54372] [BUG] test failures on win32/msvc

2008-09-11 Thread Will Coleda
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, James Keenan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coke, particle: Where do we stand on this ticket? thank you very much. kid51 I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or otherwise. Smolder is probably a better place to look for

Re: [perl #54372] [BUG] test failures on win32/msvc

2008-09-11 Thread Ron Blaschke
Will Coleda wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, James Keenan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Coke, particle: Where do we stand on this ticket? thank you very much. kid51 I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or otherwise. Smolder is probably a better

[perl #54372] [BUG] test failures on win32/msvc

2008-09-11 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Thu Sep 11 14:28:08 2008, rblasch wrote: I haven't seen this using Visual C++ 9.0. I'll also run a test with 6.0, 7.1 and 8.0. Is it okay if I close this ticket if nothing special shows up? Absolutely!

[perl #54372] [BUG] test failures on win32/msvc

2008-09-10 Thread James Keenan via RT
Coke, particle: Where do we stand on this ticket? thank you very much. kid51

[perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-07-30 Thread James Keenan via RT
Would it be possible to get an update from Win32 users on these tests? Specifically, output of 'prove -v' for these tests: t/op/arithmetics.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t (I'm going to assume that the sprintf test is still problematic.) Thank you very much. kid51

[perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-07-30 Thread James Keenan via RT
Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files on the OpenBSD Smolder tester: http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135 But, AFAICT, the Smolder server doesn't identify the particular tests within the file which are failing. kid51

Re: [perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-07-30 Thread Will Coleda
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, James Keenan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files on the OpenBSD Smolder tester: http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135 But, AFAICT, the Smolder server doesn't

[perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-07-30 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Wed Jul 30 16:26:13 2008, coke wrote: Click Goto first failure. Click Failed. Click the box of the same color as the failed box: You should see the tap output: Thanks, Coke. That enabled me to verify that for these 3 test files: t/op/arithmetics.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

[perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-07-22 Thread Tim Heckman
t/op/sprintf.t has been passing on Win32 with VC++ (r29667), see http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/2429 http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/2429/351 ok 157 - [%.0g] C99 standard mandates minus sign but C89 does not skip: MSWin32 VMS

[perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-06-18 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sat Mar 29 08:41:56 2008, rblasch wrote: t/op/sprintf.t not ok 157 - [%.0g] C99 standard mandates minus sign but C89 does not skip: MSWin32 VMS hpux:10.20 openbsd netbsd:1.5 irix actual: 0 This particular TODO-ed test has begun to unexpectedly PASS for me on linux-i386 and darwin-ppc.

Re: [perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-03-29 Thread Ron Blaschke
chromatic wrote: On Friday 28 March 2008 11:55:30 James Keenan via RT wrote: Am confused. What diagnostic output beyond 'prove -v' are you referring to? For example... t/op/arithmetics1..26 ok 1 - take the negative of a native integer ok 2 - take the absolute of

[perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-03-28 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #52198] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52198 This is one of a series of tickets reporting issues encountered at a

Re: [perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-03-28 Thread chromatic
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:06:40 James Keenan wrote: An experienced Perl-Win32 developer was able to configure Parrot successfully with 'perl Configure.pl' and build it with 'nmake'. All Parrot tests passed except those in the 4 named files. See attachment for output of 'prove -v'. Any

Re: [perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-03-28 Thread chromatic
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:55:30 James Keenan via RT wrote: Am confused. What diagnostic output beyond 'prove -v' are you referring to? For example... t/op/arithmetics1..26 ok 1 - take the negative of a native integer ok 2 - take the absolute of a native integer

[perl #52198] [BUG]: Test failures on Win32: t/op/arithmetics.t t/op/sprintf.t t/pmc/complex.t t/pmc/float.t

2008-03-28 Thread James Keenan via RT
Ah, I see that all I was sent was the output of 'prove' -- not 'prove -v'. I'll have to see if the original tester can re-run the tests.

Test failures on Win32

2007-12-18 Thread Paul Cochrane
Hi, I've been doing some testing on Win32 as well, here are my current results: (I'm also still getting the failure I posted earlier with t/examples/tutorial.t, so I've left it out) Paul System: WindowsXP cc: Visual Studio 2005 perl: ActiveState Parrot revision: 24034

(r9051) leo-ctx5 test failures on win32--msvc-7.1--perl-5.8.6

2005-08-25 Thread jerry gay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t\dynclass\gdbmhash.t 13 332813 13 100.00% 1-13 t\library\streams.t 2 512202 10.00% 18 20 t\op\gc.t1 256

[perl #18003] Make test failures under Win32 MSVC++

2005-02-03 Thread Ron Blaschke via RT
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed t/src/basic.t255 65280 22 100.00% 1-2 t/src/intlist.t 255 65280 44 100.00% 1-4 t/src/list.t 255 65280 11

[perl #18003] Make test failures under Win32 MSVC++

2002-10-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Clinton Pierce # Please include the string: [perl #18003] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18003 I sync'd up Parrot for the first time in ages today to get rid of a PerlArray PMC