Re: padding of FLOATVALs in CONSTANT section of bytecode?

2002-02-12 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 18:30, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: On Monday 11 February 2002 16:18, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: Bryan -- IIRC sizeof(opcode_t) === 4, since it is required that opcode_t be 32 bits. So, that 4 is supposed to be a 4, although turning it into a symbolic constant is not

padding of FLOATVALs in CONSTANT section of bytecode?

2002-02-07 Thread Andy Dougherty
Ok, I'm knee-deep in packfile.c looking at alignment issues, and have a two questions about storing FLOATVALs in the CONSTANTS section of the bytecode: [First, thanks to Gregor Purdy for the self-documenting packfile.c and the nice companion docs/parrotbyte.pod.] In docs/parrotbyte.pod, under