[ I think this still needs some clarification ]
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>>While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which
>>>I think might be suboptimal:
>>>pdd0
At 7:38 PM +0100 12/18/03, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PDD 03 states that the *object* goes in P2. This works out just fine
with perl 5 style method calls, where the argument list doesn't
distinguish the object other than by position. What happens is that
w
At 12:44 PM -0500 12/18/03, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 10:42 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing
which I think might be suboptimal:
pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't
really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which
>>I think might be suboptimal:
>>pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't
>>really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 in
At 10:42 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I
think might be suboptimal:
pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't really
play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods are plain
s
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PDD 03 states that the *object* goes in P2. This works out just fine
> with perl 5 style method calls, where the argument list doesn't
> distinguish the object other than by position. What happens is that
> when a perl 5 sub is called, @_ is a combination
Dan Sugalski writes:
> At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which
> >I think might be suboptimal:
> >pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't
> >really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I
> think might be suboptimal:
>
> pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't
> really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods
> are plain
At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which
I think might be suboptimal:
pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't
really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods
are plain sub
While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I
think might be suboptimal:
pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't really
play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods are plain
subs, where the first param is the object. I dunno, if
10 matches
Mail list logo