[RESEND] Re: pdd03 and method calls

2004-01-11 Thread Leopold Toetsch
[ I think this still needs some clarification ] Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>>While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which >>>I think might be suboptimal: >>>pdd0

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 7:38 PM +0100 12/18/03, Juergen Boemmels wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: PDD 03 states that the *object* goes in P2. This works out just fine with perl 5 style method calls, where the argument list doesn't distinguish the object other than by position. What happens is that w

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:44 PM -0500 12/18/03, Melvin Smith wrote: At 10:42 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I think might be suboptimal: pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which >>I think might be suboptimal: >>pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't >>really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 in

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-18 Thread Melvin Smith
At 10:42 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I think might be suboptimal: pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods are plain s

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-18 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PDD 03 states that the *object* goes in P2. This works out just fine > with perl 5 style method calls, where the argument list doesn't > distinguish the object other than by position. What happens is that > when a perl 5 sub is called, @_ is a combination

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-18 Thread Luke Palmer
Dan Sugalski writes: > At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which > >I think might be suboptimal: > >pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't > >really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-18 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I > think might be suboptimal: > > pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't > really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods > are plain

Re: pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:42 PM +0100 12/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I think might be suboptimal: pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods are plain sub

pdd03 and method calls

2003-12-17 Thread Leopold Toetsch
While playing with calling threaded subs, I came along a thing which I think might be suboptimal: pdd03 states that the method PMC should go into P2. This doesn't really play with Perl5 <-> Perl6 interoperbility IMHO. Perl5 methods are plain subs, where the first param is the object. I dunno, if