I've just committed an initial pass on the Installation PDD. It's
looking good, definitely a good start. I've included some comments to
seed further discussion and development of the draft.
Also, we'll need to include more details on the installation of Parrot
itself (the draft leans pretty
[Subject changed to pdd30_install, as we are talking about this the
whole time]
Allison Randal schrieb:
Will Coleda wrote:
At the moment I'm planning for language pbcs to go into
.../parrot/library/ so they can be easily accessed via
load_bytecode. I've found that in a dynamic environment
Reini Urban wrote:
Problem:
Most packages will not accept packages with /usr/bin/scheme,
/usr/bin/lisp, /usr/bin/forth, /usr/bin/lua, /usr/bin/tclsh
were these are the parrot implementations.
Of course we don't want to hijack existing language executables in the
distribution packages. But,
2008/8/29 Allison Randal:
Reini Urban wrote:
Current exceptions for the parrot- prefix:
perl6
Actually, that probably won't be an exception to the parrot- prefix on the
package name, since there are multiple implementations of Perl 6.
Ok, so there will be pugs, perl -Mv6 and rakudo |
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
Problem:
Most packages will not accept packages with /usr/bin/scheme,
/usr/bin/lisp, /usr/bin/forth, /usr/bin/lua, /usr/bin/tclsh
were these are the parrot implementations.
Of course we don't want
Reini Urban wrote:
Ok, so there will be pugs, perl -Mv6 and rakudo | parrot-perl6
Maybe both /usr/bin/rakudo and /usr/bin/perl6 should be symlinked to
/usr/bin/parrot-perl6 then.
Currently there's only a /usr/bin/perl6 being installed.
This really should be made ready for the September
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:10:21PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
2008/8/29 Allison Randal:
Reini Urban wrote:
Current exceptions for the parrot- prefix:
perl6
Actually, that probably won't be an exception to the parrot- prefix on the
package name, since there are multiple implementations
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:10:21PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
2008/8/29 Allison Randal:
... the $0 handling will be built in to Parrot, so the
user could also easily create their own 'ln -s' aliases.
Within the PCT::HLLCompiler I assume.
PCT::HLLCompiler can't do it
