At 09:40 PM 9/9/00 +0100, Matthew Gillman wrote:
>Basically, my comment is that a lot of commercial applications seem to be
>mixing and matching languages together (like C++ and Perl), so it would be
>really great if the issues such as Purify errors for embedded Perl were
>addressed (I realise
At 10:26 PM 9/9/00 -0400, Steven W McDougall wrote:
>RFC 178 proposes a shared data model for Perl6 threads. In a shared
>data model
>- globals are shared unless localized
>- file-scoped lexicals are shared unless the thread recompiles the
> file
>- block scoped lexicals may be shared by
> - p
At 07:58 PM 9/9/00 +, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>Ken Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Short
> >circuiting should not be customizable by each type for example.
>
>We are already having that argument^Wdiscussion elsewhere ;-)
>
>But I agree variable vtables are not the place for that.
As do I,
At 09:43 PM 9/9/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>DS> Right, but databases are all dealing with mainly disk access. A 1ms lock
>DS> operation's no big deal when it takes 100ms to fetch the data being
>locked.
>DS> A 1ms lock operation *is*
Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> Please elaborate.
How deep do you go?
$h{a}{b}{c}{d}{e}{f}
This is my last mail on this subject - it is a half-assed idea, and this
whole thread is becoming too tedious for words. Actually, I'd extend
that to the whole p6 process. In fact I think I'll just unsubscribe.
--- Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "SWM" == Steven W McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> SWM> If you actually compile a Perl program, like
>
> SWM> $a = $b
>
> SWM> and then look at the op tree, you won't find the
> symbol "$b", or "b"
> SWM> anywhere in it. The
I have one question about vtbls that I have not been able
to figure out an answer to:
How does using a vtbl get rid of the switch(sv->sv_flags)
with multi-valued scalars running around? That is, how does
one write a vtbl function that can cope with the perl6
equivalent of perl5's
sv_setiv(s
> "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Now where
>> sub recursive() { my $a :shared; ; return
>> recursive() }
>> would put $a or even which $a is meant, is left as an
>> excersize
>> for someone brighter than me.
BS> %P6-E-MEANINGLESS, "my $a : shared" is a meaningless
> "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BS> I have one question about vtbls that I have not been able
BS> to figure out an answer to:
BS> How does using a vtbl get rid of the switch(sv->sv_flags)
BS> with multi-valued scalars running around? That is, how does
BS> one write a v
Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > "GL" == Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> GL> Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> >> ($foo, $baz, @bar) = (1,(2,3),4) # $foo = 1 $baz=2, @bar=(3,4)
> >>
> >> Actually, looking at it like that makes it an ugly situation. The 'new'
> >> expectation would be to have it
10 matches
Mail list logo
