Hi everyone,
I just tried to build parrot (something I hadn't done in about a month
and a half) and it failed to build due to gmp_version being undeclared
in src/pmc/bigint.pmc (not suprising since I don't have GMP installed).
Attached is a patch that fixes the problem for me. Using the
preprocess
Hi everyone,
When building parrot on my iBook, two tests that depend on PCRE failed
because I don't have PCRE installed and the code that determines if
PCRE is installed is faulty. Parrot::Test::run_command returns [SIGNAL
$exit_code] if the exit code of the commands are not divisible by 256,
or i
James Keenan via RT wrote on Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 06:31:27PM PDT:
> 1. I added a reference to RT 42360 which requests unit tests for the
> SVK portion of Parrot::Revision's code.
>
> 2. Would it be possible to add tests for the git-related code in your
> patch to the following 4 test files:
>
>
Testing svn file metadata isn't always appropriate when using git. When
git mirrors an svn repo, it can store the metadata for each file in
.git/svn/git-svn/unhandled.log, but sometimes the user chooses not to
store the metadata. If the user does store it, this patch allows for the
tests to pass (a
jerry gay wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 07:17:07AM PDT:
> ...
>
> perhaps it's not explicit enough in the description, but
> F is copied directly from perl's repository. modifying
> this file is not recommended, as future synchronizations from a newer
> perl will likely overwrite previous parrot c
Bob Rogers wrote on Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 04:28:03PM PDT:
> I suspect Gmail because you and Paul are the only ones affected, and you
> both have Gmail addresses However, I have no explanation why
> Klaas-Jan and Jerry (the other two Gmail users to post in the last
> three days) seem to be unaffe
chromatic wrote on Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 11:09:24PM PDT:
> There's almost no vtable entry documentation in src/pmc/undef.pmc. You can
> copy it almost verbatim from almost any other PMC. This is an easy task that
> requires almost no C or Perl knowledge.
This isn't much documentation, and I hope
James Keenan via RT wrote on Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:32:59PM PST:
> ...
> Determining what C compiler and linker to use...Compilation failed with
> '/usr/bin/gcc-3.3'
>
> Here's the output with -verbose-step=7 (inter::progs).
>
> Determining what C compiler and linker to use...
> ccflags: -fno-c
On 7/28/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks for the effort! however, i don't want to apply this patch as it
is. 're_tests' was stolen directly from perl5's test suite. the idea
is that the test data this file contains is
implementation-independent. therefore, if some other crazy perso
On 7/28/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/28/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the effort! however, i don't want to apply this patch as it
> is. 're_tests' was stolen directly from perl5's test suite. the idea
> is that the test data this file contains is
> impleme
10 matches
Mail list logo