gmp_version undeclared

2006-09-17 Thread David Romano
Hi everyone, I just tried to build parrot (something I hadn't done in about a month and a half) and it failed to build due to gmp_version being undeclared in src/pmc/bigint.pmc (not suprising since I don't have GMP installed). Attached is a patch that fixes the problem for me. Using the preprocess

pcre tests

2006-09-17 Thread David Romano
Hi everyone, When building parrot on my iBook, two tests that depend on PCRE failed because I don't have PCRE installed and the code that determines if PCRE is installed is faulty. Parrot::Test::run_command returns [SIGNAL $exit_code] if the exit code of the commands are not divisible by 256, or i

Re: [perl #44753] [PATCH] find current revision for git

2007-08-19 Thread David Romano
James Keenan via RT wrote on Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 06:31:27PM PDT: > 1. I added a reference to RT 42360 which requests unit tests for the > SVK portion of Parrot::Revision's code. > > 2. Would it be possible to add tests for the git-related code in your > patch to the following 4 test files: > >

[PATCH] t/distro/file_metadata.t and git

2007-08-19 Thread David Romano
Testing svn file metadata isn't always appropriate when using git. When git mirrors an svn repo, it can store the metadata for each file in .git/svn/git-svn/unhandled.log, but sometimes the user chooses not to store the metadata. If the user does store it, this patch allows for the tests to pass (a

Re: [perl #38982] [CAGE] refactor long test files

2007-08-20 Thread David Romano
jerry gay wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 07:17:07AM PDT: > ... > > perhaps it's not explicit enough in the description, but > F is copied directly from perl's repository. modifying > this file is not recommended, as future synchronizations from a newer > perl will likely overwrite previous parrot c

Re: Test coverage of Parrot's C-language components

2007-09-17 Thread David Romano
Bob Rogers wrote on Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 04:28:03PM PDT: > I suspect Gmail because you and Paul are the only ones affected, and you > both have Gmail addresses However, I have no explanation why > Klaas-Jan and Jerry (the other two Gmail users to post in the last > three days) seem to be unaffe

Re: [perl #44945] [CAGE] Add Documentation to Undef PMC

2007-10-26 Thread David Romano
chromatic wrote on Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 11:09:24PM PDT: > There's almost no vtable entry documentation in src/pmc/undef.pmc. You can > copy it almost verbatim from almost any other PMC. This is an easy task that > requires almost no C or Perl knowledge. This isn't much documentation, and I hope

Re: [perl #50056] [BUG] "Undefined symbols" on OS X

2008-01-27 Thread David Romano
James Keenan via RT wrote on Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:32:59PM PST: > ... > Determining what C compiler and linker to use...Compilation failed with > '/usr/bin/gcc-3.3' > > Here's the output with -verbose-step=7 (inter::progs). > > Determining what C compiler and linker to use... > ccflags: -fno-c

Re: [perl #39997] [PATCH] PGE P5 Test Cleanup

2006-08-01 Thread David Romano
On 7/28/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks for the effort! however, i don't want to apply this patch as it is. 're_tests' was stolen directly from perl5's test suite. the idea is that the test data this file contains is implementation-independent. therefore, if some other crazy perso

Re: [perl #39997] [PATCH] PGE P5 Test Cleanup

2006-08-01 Thread David Romano
On 7/28/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/28/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for the effort! however, i don't want to apply this patch as it > is. 're_tests' was stolen directly from perl5's test suite. the idea > is that the test data this file contains is > impleme