Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:44 AM +0200 7/28/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
2) Some Mops numbers, all on i386/linux Athlon 800, slightly shortend:
(»make mops« in parrot root)
Just out of curiosity, I presume the (rather abysmal) perl 6 numbers
include time to generate the assembly and
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:44 AM +0200 7/28/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
2) Some Mops numbers, all on i386/linux Athlon 800, slightly shortend:
Just out of curiosity, I presume the (rather abysmal) perl 6 numbers
After the bugfix in perlarray.pmc I can bring you new numbers, which are
not
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
Sean O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
languages/perl6/README sort of hides it, but it does say that If you have
Perl = 5.005_03, $a += 3 may fail to parse. I guess we can upgrade
that to if you have 5.6, you lose.
I notice
At 10:23 AM 7/30/2002 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Just out of curiosity, I presume the (rather abysmal) perl 6 numbers
We have already the same Mops as perl5, but additionaly 2.3 seconds
overhead. Just running the byte code is as fast as perl5.
Without jit, mops.p6
