S02 provides this example for treating curlies literally in a quoted string:
qq:!c Here are { $two uninterpolated } curlies;
But can I escape them with a backslash? I was surprised that I couldn't
find anything in S02 which said either yes or no. Perhaps this falls
under the heading of
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 09:45:52 2008
New Revision: 14508
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
Some clarifications requested by jonathan++
Changed role-private attributes to be declared with my $!foo
The has declarator now explicitly always participates in composition
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 14:54:28 2008
New Revision: 14510
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
Clarification of identifier extensions requested by thom++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==
---
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 10:17:28 2008
New Revision: 14509
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Tightened up rules on grammar-munging subs, must use term:foo or prefix:foo
Sigs of () and ($x) are no longer enough.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:16:02PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
S02 says A bare closure also interpolates in double-quotish context.
I presume that there are no restrictions on the code inside that closure,
but all the examples I've seen have nothing but expressions inside the
closure (though
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:51:21PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
S02 provides this example for treating curlies literally in a quoted string:
qq:!c Here are { $two uninterpolated } curlies;
But can I escape them with a backslash? I was surprised that I couldn't
find anything in S02 which
+Despite the appearance as a subscripting form, these names are resolved
+not at run time but at compile time. The pseudo-subscripts need not
+be simple scalars. These are extended with the same two-element list:
+
+infix:?? !!
+infix:['??','!!']
Huh. I thought that
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 15:59:31 2008
New Revision: 14511
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
Clarification of backslash rules for non-interpolating chars for thom++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:59:28PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: +Despite the appearance as a subscripting form, these names are resolved
: +not at run time but at compile time. The pseudo-subscripts need not
: +be simple scalars. These are extended with the same two-element list:
: +
:
