Hello,
This message is an update to my post from yesterday of the same subject. If you
don't have it handy, then a copy is archived at
http://mm.darrenduncan.net/pipermail/muldis-db-devel/2009-April/23.html .
I have significantly updated the Muldis D code samples of yesterday and the
Em Qua, 2009-04-08 às 01:04 -0700, Darren Duncan escreveu:
To recap, Muldis D is my new programming language part of whose purpose is to
eventually succeed SQL as the query+DDL language of choice for relational
DBMSs,
in the same manner that Perl 6 is intended to eventually supplant Perl 5.
P.S. Since Daniel cc'd the list with a reply, I will likewise.
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Sorry for bitching, but...
What exactly is the problem you're trying to solve? I mean, what is so
bad about SQL? and how does Muldis D solves it?
The very broad answer: It's not so much that SQL is terrible;
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-04-10 02:44:36 +0200 (Fri, 10 Apr 2009)
New Revision: 26167
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
Eliminate listop forms of sigils.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
