HaloO
Jon Lang wrote:
Larry Wall wrote:
eqv and === autothread just like any other comparisons. If you really
want to compare the contents of two junctions, you have to use the
results of some magical .eigenmumble method to return the contents
as a non-junction. Possibly stringification will
HaloO,
reading the Collapsing Junction states thread I wondered
how eqv and === handle junctions. I would expect
all(1,2) === all(1,2)
to evaluate to True and not expand to
1 === 1 1 === 2 2 === 1 2 === 2
which is False. OTOH,
2 === any(1,2,3)
should be False because 2.WHAT is
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:37:21PM +0100, TSa wrote:
HaloO,
reading the Collapsing Junction states thread I wondered
how eqv and === handle junctions. I would expect
all(1,2) === all(1,2)
to evaluate to True and not expand to
1 === 1 1 === 2 2 === 1 2 === 2
which is False.
Larry Wall wrote:
eqv and === autothread just like any other comparisons. If you really
want to compare the contents of two junctions, you have to use the
results of some magical .eigenmumble method to return the contents
as a non-junction. Possibly stringification will be sufficient, if
it
