Greg Williams wrote:
> Interesting! I have a few questions (meandering thoughts) though
>
> The example in the RFC gives:
>
> sub A{
> my $A = shift;
> return with;
> };
>
> $context1 = A(3);
> print "$context1"; # something like CONTEXT(0XF0GD0
At 18:43 -0500 2000/10/02, David L. Nicol wrote:
>Hmm. C could be implemented in terms of the rfc 340 C like
>so:
>
> $scope_out_here = with;
> if ($ints) {
> with $scope_out_here {use integer}
> };
>
>C is about subroutine calls.
Interesting! I have a few questions (meandering thoug
Greg Williams wrote:
> as I remember, the C pragma, when used, would simply act as if the
>enclosing scope were not in place, enabling such things as:
> if ($ints) {
> no scope;
> use integer;
> }
Hmm. C could be implemented in terms of the rfc 340 C like
so:
$scope_out_here = with;
On Sep 30 2000 22:38:58, Perl6 RFC Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>=head1 ABSTRACT
>
>C is extended to allow complete access to the "call frame" of
>the current subroutine call.
>
would this be better suited by the previously proposed (i'm not sure for perl6 though)
C pragma? Loo
> > caller->eval EXPRESSION;
>
> That's mad, bad, scary and dangerous. Let's do it.
Yes, this is cool. In fact, I'm writing Regexp::Func right now as a
prototype for RFC 164 and discovering I could really use this - in fact,
need it.
A couple things:
1. Implement this eval as UNIVERSA
Perl6 RFC Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This and other RFCs are available on the web at
> http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
>
> =head1 TITLE
>
> caller->eval BLOCK
>
> =head1 VERSION
>
> Maintainer: David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 28 Sep 2000
> Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
caller->eval BLOCK
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: David Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 28 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 339
Version: 1
Status: Developing
=head1 ABSTRACT
C is e
