Chip Salzenberg writes:
Ouch. I gather, then, that nntp.perl.org does not house complete list
archives, or else the discussion was not on p6-language ... ?
It should have complete archives. It uses the same backend data as
the html version on archive.develooper.com.
At 5:46 AM +0100 7/11/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 4:24 PM +0100 7/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
3. Is C%MY intended to reflect the PAD?
At 11:52 PM -0400 7/10/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Dan Sugalski:
One pad per block, rather than per sub.
Because, of course, all blocks are subs. Got it.
Yep. (Well, modulo optimizations of course ;)
The place where you'll run into problems in where you have multiple
variables
According to Dave Mitchell:
Based on what I rememeber from the long threads about this,
Ouch. I gather, then, that nntp.perl.org does not house complete list
archives, or else the discussion was not on p6-language ... ?
sub import {
caller(1).MY{'foo'} = sub { ... };
}
Got
According to Dan Sugalski:
One pad per block, rather than per sub.
Because, of course, all blocks are subs. Got it.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. -[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It furthers one to have somewhere to go.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:20AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The place where you'll run into problems in where you have multiple
variables of the same name at the same level, which you can do in
perl 5.
can it?
can you give an example?
--
In England there is a special word which means
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 11:57:02PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Dave Mitchell:
Based on what I rememeber from the long threads about this,
Ouch. I gather, then, that nntp.perl.org does not house complete list
archives, or else the discussion was not on p6-language ... ?
At 7:18 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:20AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The place where you'll run into problems in where you have multiple
variables of the same name at the same level, which you can do in
perl 5.
can it?
Yes.
can you give an example?
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:29:08PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:18 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:20AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The place where you'll run into problems in where you have multiple
variables of the same name at the same level,
At 2:47 PM -0400 7/11/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Dan Sugalski:
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
3a. If so, how can one distinguish among the e.g. many Cmy $foo
variables declared within the current function?
One pad per block, rather than per sub.
At 7:35 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:29:08PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:18 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:20AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The place where you'll run into problems in where you have multiple
According to Dan Sugalski:
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
3a. If so, how can one distinguish among the e.g. many Cmy $foo
variables declared within the current function?
One pad per block, rather than per sub.
I just remembered why I thought that woundn't work:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:29:08PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:18 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:20AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The place where you'll run into problems in where you have multiple
variables of the same name at the same level,
On Thursday 11 July 2002 11:47 am, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Dan Sugalski:
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
3a. If so, how can one distinguish among the e.g. many Cmy $foo
variables declared within the current function?
One pad per block, rather
At 9:18 PM +0100 7/11/02, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:29:08PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:18 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:20AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The place where you'll run into problems in where you have multiple
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:18:27PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:35 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:29:08PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:18 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:41:20AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:37:27PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Is there any specific case where you can't treat
{
my $foo = 12;
print $foo;
my $foo = ho;
print $foo;
}
as
{
my $foo = 12;
print $foo;
{
my $foo = ho;
print $foo;
}
}
Well, it B*gg*rs
At 11:45 PM +0100 7/11/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:37:27PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Is there any specific case where you can't treat
{
my $foo = 12;
print $foo;
my $foo = ho;
print $foo;
}
as
{
my $foo = 12;
print $foo;
{
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:50:26PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Based on what I rememeber from the long threads about this,
3. Is C%MY intended to reflect the PAD?
loosely speaking yes.
3a. If so, how can one distinguish among the e.g. many Cmy $foo
variables declared
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
3. Is C%MY intended to reflect the PAD?
Yes.
3a. If so, how can one distinguish among the e.g. many Cmy $foo
variables declared within the current function?
One pad per block, rather than per sub.
--
At 04:24 PM 7/10/2002 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
3. Is C%MY intended to reflect the PAD?
Yes.
Hey! How's this for a scary thought:
$continuation.the_pad
I'll get my coat.
Hah, good
Chip Salzenberg wrote in perl.perl6.language :
In (re?)examining the Apocalypses, I've found something that confuses me a
bit. A2 refers to CMY as a pseudopackage and says:
__LINE__ becomes MY.line
__FILE__MY.file
[...]
With regard to CMY:
2. What are
At 4:24 PM +0100 7/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 9:50 PM -0400 7/9/02, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
3. Is C%MY intended to reflect the PAD?
Yes.
Hey! How's this for a scary thought:
$continuation.the_pad
What's that supposed to do, though?
At 10:12 PM + 7/10/02, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Chip Salzenberg wrote in perl.perl6.language :
In (re?)examining the Apocalypses, I've found something that confuses me a
bit. A2 refers to CMY as a pseudopackage and says:
__LINE__ becomes MY.line
__FILE__
24 matches
Mail list logo
