{ ... } # maybe?
but that's probably more obscure than the comma.
Okay, so I don't have any good ideas either, but I like also if
we're getting rid of the C comma.
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damian Conway writes:
Perhaps this is yet another argument for insisting on:
while do {$n++; $foo $bar}
instead.
Yes please! Is anybody here a fan of the C comma? I don't think I've
ever used it -- well, not intentionally, anyway -- but these are the
situations where I've spotted
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:46:39PM -0700, John Williams wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
or maybe throw some latin in there
while $n++ et @accum $total { ... }
while $n++ cum @accum $total { ... } # maybe?
I think ac is the latin conjunction you
worse, though.
Hmm. Why not just explicitly allow semicolon when surrounded by parens?
while ($n++; $foo $bar) {...}
Well, because the intent of the original proposal was to fatten up the
C comma to make it explicit, easy to see, and clearly unambiguous. A
semicolon does none
Adam Turoff wrote:
Damian Conway wrote:
Perhaps this is yet another argument for insisting on:
while do {$n++; $foo $bar}
instead.
That looks like syntactic sugar for
while (do) {$n++; $foo $bar}
do is not merely prototyped, but a builtin. With a mandatory {}
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:00:38PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
The C comma has always bugged me, but its function is indeed useful
(many times I use Cand in its place, if I know the left side will
always be true). I don't know whether it's staying or not (I've heard
rumors of both), but I'd
Honestly you guys, I'm not trolling. I'm just getting a lot of ideas
recently. :-)
Honestly, I'm not an expert on Perl 6 syntax. (And I actually am being
honest... ;-) But I'll throw in my 2 cents anyway. :-)
snipah
This word: Cthen.
So, from a recent script of mine:
my $n;
