On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:58:31 +0200, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) skribis 2005-06-10 9:32 (-):
Interesting. Could you provide some more information, like perhaps a
message body?
My appologies, my news client crashed when I attempted to compose
this.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 03:38:28AM -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)
wrote:
: From my exprence
: with perl5 and from playing around with pugs I've noticed that when
: eval(Str $evalstring) is used I mostly use it like this (in perl5)
:
: eval ...; Or
:
: eval __EVALEND__;
: ...
:
--
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia. See
http://dformosa.zeta.org.au/~dformosa/Spelling.html to find out more.
Free the Memes.
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) skribis 2005-06-10 9:32 (-):
Interesting. Could you provide some more information, like perhaps a
message body?
I personally don't think string eval should be made too easy|simple. We
don't want to end up with people thinking we upgraded Tcl.
Juerd
--
