[perl6/specs] 5d2e83: unspec quotemeta, fixes #89

2015-04-24 Thread GitHub
-bits.pod M S29-functions.pod M S32-setting-library/Str.pod Log Message: --- unspec quotemeta, fixes #89

[perl6/specs] d251a6: unspec quotemeta, fixes #89

2015-04-24 Thread GitHub
-bits.pod M S29-functions.pod M S32-setting-library/Str.pod Log Message: --- unspec quotemeta, fixes #89

Re: quotemeta

2005-03-16 Thread Larry Wall
rpolation, not the entire : > interpolation. It just wants to be a miscellaneous function hidden : > in the bowels of the core somewhere. : : Doesn't it want to be the method .escaped then? The method could support : all kinds of escaping/encoding. The question is, escaped for what? q

Re: quotemeta

2005-03-16 Thread Juerd
Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-16 9:41 (-0800): > Except that q:meta would be an upgrade in terms of specialness, > and besides, it's inside out from what you want, which is to quote > a particular argument to a string interpolation, not the entire > interpolation. It just wants to be a miscellaneous

Re: quotemeta

2005-03-16 Thread Larry Wall
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:17:33AM +, Richard Proctor wrote: : On Wed 16 Mar, Rod Adams wrote: : > I vote for axing C in favor of C and C. : > : : Given A05 states that bare scalars match literally, quotemeta is (almost?) : obsolete. It can certainly be downgraded. Except that q:meta

Re: quotemeta

2005-03-16 Thread Richard Proctor
On Wed 16 Mar, Rod Adams wrote: > I vote for axing C in favor of C and C. > Given A05 states that bare scalars match literally, quotemeta is (almost?) obsolete. It can certainly be downgraded. Richard -- Personal [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.waveney.org Telecoms

quotemeta

2005-03-16 Thread Rod Adams
I vote for axing C in favor of C and C. -- Rod Adams