On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 05:48:04PM -0500, Austin Hastings wrote:
> > From: Uri Guttman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > AH> PS: While I'm somewhat sympathetic to the fact that eu guys are
> > AH> trying to spin up 200 years worth of
> "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> reminds me of the great line: in EU they consider a 100 miles a long
>> distance, in the US we consider 100 years a long time. :)
AH> That's very good. I'm going to recycle it. Do you know the author?
dunno. i have heard it from
According to Austin Hastings:
> When you consider some of the issues, it's sort of obvious that they're
> trying *real* hard not to say, "Look the Americans solved this problem
> already."
Three words: "Second System Effect".
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTE
From: Uri Guttman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Uri Guttman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> but he if worked on that at the rate he is churning out apocalypses,
it
> >> would be anot
And should stay off-list, thanks.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
> "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Uri Guttman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> but he if worked on that at the rate he is churning out apocalypses, it
>> would be another 200 years. this is not a knock on larry but a comment
> -Original Message-
> From: Uri Guttman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AH> PS: While I'm somewhat sympathetic to the fact that eu guys are
> AH> trying to spin up 200 years worth of amendments and supreme court
> AH> decisi
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 09:30 PM 1/5/2004 +, Piers Cawley wrote:
>>Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > At 07:55 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
>> >>The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> > people's salaries will depend on
> "AH" == Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AH> PS: While I'm somewhat sympathetic to the fact that eu guys are
AH> trying to spin up 200 years worth of amendments and supreme court
AH> decisions at the same time, it's still a ratf*ck. Eu need to get
AH> eurselves a Larry. I
At 09:30 PM 1/5/2004 +, Piers Cawley wrote:
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 07:55 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
>>The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > people's salaries will depend on Parrot. I confess I wouldn't be
>> > surprised if, b
The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I confess
> I wouldn't be surprised if,
> by the end of the year,
> we haven't seen
> the full implementation of
> at least one of
> the big
> non-Perl
> scripting languages
> on top of Parrot.
Obviously you've been reading the proposed EU con
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 10:55, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
>
>> The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > I confess I wouldn't be
>> > surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen the full
>> > implementation of at least
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 07:55 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
>>The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > people's salaries will depend on Parrot. I confess I wouldn't be
>> > surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen the full
Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Me? I think Perl 6's design 'in the large' will be pretty much
>> done once Apocalypse 12 and its corresponding Exegesis are
>> finished. Of course, the devil is in the details, but
David Storrs wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 11:12:31AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:57:17AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > : For one, one role's methods don't silently override another's.
> > : Instead, you get, er, role conflict and you have to disambiguate
> > : your
* Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-05 20:42]:
> I'm confused, are you optimistic or pessimistic in that last
> sentence?
Sounds carefully optimistic to me. At least it certainly doesn't
sound pessimistic per se, no?
--
Regards,
Aristotle
"If you can't laugh at yourself, you d
At 07:55 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> people's salaries will depend on Parrot. I confess I wouldn't be
> surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen the full
> implementation of at least one of the big non-
The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Me? I think Perl 6's design 'in the large' will be pretty much done once
> Apocalypse 12 and its corresponding Exegesis are finished. Of course,
> the devil is in the details, but I don't doubt that the hoped for
> existence of a w
On 1/5/04 1:55 PM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
> The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I confess I wouldn't be surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen
>> the full implementation of at least one of the big non-Perl scripting
>> languages on top of Parrot.
>
> I'm confu
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20040104
What a surprise, a scant week after the last Perl 6 Summary of 2003,
it's the first Perl 6 Summary of 2004. Will wonders never cease? Without
further ado, we'll start with perl6-internals as usual.
Garbage Collection Tasks
Dan noted
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 11:12:31AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:57:17AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> : For one, one role's methods don't silently override another's. Instead,
> : you get, er, role conflict and you have to disambiguate yourself.
How do you disambiguate?
21 matches
Mail list logo
