Hi,
What is the correct way to do pass through args?
In perl 5 we would do:
sub whatever {
...
nested_call(@_);
...
}
but slurpy args are undesireable, since they are lossy:
data loss - shape of input parameters is
Today I wrote some perl 5 code that looked like this:
my %index_by_x;
my %index_by_y;
my %index_by_z;
foreach my $thing (@things){
( $index_by_x{$thing-x_value} ||=
Set::Object-new)-insert($thing);
( $index_by_y{$thing-y_value} ||=
While nothingmuch and I are gutting junctions and trying to find the
right balance of useful/dangerous, I'm going to propose a new way to
do autothreading that doesn't use junctions at all.
First, let me show you why I think junctions aren't good enough:
I can't extract the information that the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 09:45:02 +, Luke Palmer wrote:
Where the meta operator is pointing to the parentheses around the
call. Then it is easy to do my map above:
my ($val1, $val2, $val3) = foo(bar, 1,2,3, baz)
I think a some and of the same shape thrown into to the
parameters is
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:18:42 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
nested_call.wrap(), maybe?
It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:56:58 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
While I think your P6 code is great, I don't feel you're comparing apples to
apples. In all your P6 examples you effectively break the autovivify step
out
from the other steps. You can do that in P5 too:
To me the code below
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:18:42 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
nested_call.wrap(), maybe?
It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is for wrapping only. This
applies to super methods,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:02:25 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
nested_call.wrap(), maybe?
It's not 100% the same thing... Wrapping is for wrapping only. This
applies to super methods, delegate methods, and so forth.
--
() Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xEBD27418 perl hacker
/\ kung foo
On Aug 28, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
oops... Can I forward our correspondence to the mailing list?
Sure. I was wondering why you took it private. :
--Dks
Luke wrote:
Now I'm going to propose a variant for circumfix:
foo(1, @a, 2);
Where the meta operator is pointing to the parentheses around the
call. Then it is easy to do my map above:
my ($val1, $val2, $val3) = foo(bar, 1,2,3, baz)
You're going to need to find another syntax.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 22:22:07 +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
You're going to need to find another syntax. That one already means something
else (namely, shell-like interpolating word list).
Luke said he was going to sleep, so I'll point you to some chat logs
instead of letting you wait for his
Yuval Kogman wrote:
Luke said he was going to sleep, so I'll point you to some chat logs
instead of letting you wait for his reply:
http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2005-08-28,Sunsel=281#l460
Thanks for that.
Bottom line: the aim is to change the meaning.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
