On 8/31/05, Ingo Blechschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
@array = $scalar;# really means
@array = ($scalar,); # same as
If list construction is via the infix:, operator, does that mean a
blasphemous sinner could create infix:,= as a synonym for
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 13:43:57 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
Uh yeah, I think that's what I was saying. To clarify:
sub foo (prefix:+) { 1 == 2 }# 1 and 2 in numeric context
foo(say); # nothing printed
But:
sub foo (prefix:+) { +1 == +2 }
foo(say);# 1 and 2
On 01/09/05, Ashley Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If list construction is via the infix:, operator, does that mean a
blasphemous sinner could create infix:,= as a synonym for push?
If the self-assignment metaoperator works the way I think it does[1],
then you shouldn't even need to create
Ashley Winters skribis 2005-09-01 0:58 (-0700):
If list construction is via the infix:, operator, does that mean a
blasphemous sinner could create infix:,= as a synonym for push?
You could do that even without , being a list constructor.
However, in general, chained operators like comma,
Stuart Cook skribis 2005-09-01 22:49 (+1000):
[1] i.e. magically applies itself to any valid infix operator, just
like »« and [] do
, is not a normal binary infix operator. It's not even binary, although
it can of course be used with only two operands.
Juerd
--
On 9/1/05, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 13:43:57 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
Uh yeah, I think that's what I was saying. To clarify:
sub foo (prefix:+) { 1 == 2 }# 1 and 2 in numeric context
foo(say); # nothing printed
But:
sub foo
Hi,
my $arrayref = a b c;
for @$arrayref {...};# loop body executed three times, of course
for ($arrayref,) {...}; # loop body executed only one time
for ($arrayref) {...}; # loop body executed one or three times?
for $arrayref {...}; # loop body executed one or
Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-09-01 20:29 (+0200):
for ($arrayref,) {...}; # loop body executed only one time
Yes: scalar in list context.
for ($arrayref) {...}; # loop body executed one or three times?
Same thing: scalar in list context. So once.
for $arrayref {...}; #
On 9/1/05, Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just commited into bleadperl a patch that implements this :
$ ./perl -e 'no 5'
Perls since v5.0.0 too modern--this is v5.9.3, stopped at -e line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1.
That is, the exact
I just commited into bleadperl a patch that implements this :
$ ./perl -e 'no 5'
Perls since v5.0.0 too modern--this is v5.9.3, stopped at -e line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1.
That is, the exact opposite of the current use VERSION syntax.
One of the uses I had
On 9/1/05, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-09-01 20:29 (+0200):
for ($arrayref,) {...}; # loop body executed only one time
Yes: scalar in list context.
for ($arrayref) {...}; # loop body executed one or three times?
Same thing: scalar in list
= WWW::Kontent 0.02
I am happy to announce the release of WWW::Kontent 0.02:
File: $CPAN/authors/id/B/BR/BRENTDAX/WWW-Kontent-0.02.tar.gz
Size: 62121 bytes
MD5: 513018f0f2f8a0533a79d0b642323f2b
http://search.cpan.org/~brentdax/WWW-Kontent-0.02/
Please note that it may take
12 matches
Mail list logo
